Laserfiche WebLink
The property is zoned R1-c which requires lots to be 11,000 sq. ft. in size with a minimum width of 80- <br />feet. The applicant would like to complete a lot line adjustment where Lot 11, Block 2, Orono Lake <br />Addition (75-468-0265) will expand/absorb into Parcel A (8,779 sq. ft. & about 44' wide) leaving Parcel B <br />(7,612 sq. ft. & about 44' wide) as a stand-alone buildable lot, but which does not meet the lot size <br />standards of the zoning district, thus requiring the variance. <br />Applicable Regulation <br />Variances may be granted when the petitioner establishes that the variance satisfies all five of the criteria <br />described below. The variance is: <br />Is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance, and <br />The purpose and intent of the ordinance is to maintain uniform development in a neighborhood or <br />zoning district, provide a reasonable buildable area for asingle-family home, and to provide <br />reasonable distances between structures, as established by the ordinance. While the current property <br />owners have no intention of developing Parcel B, the undersized parcel can support a structure <br />approximately 22' x 100'. The minimum house width allowed by ordinance is 22 feet. <br />The variance is not in harmony with general purpose and intent of the ordinance. <br />2. Is consistent with the City of Elk River Comprehensive Plan. <br />The property is guided for residential. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />Variances may be granted when the petitioner establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying <br />with the zoning ordinance. Practical difficulties means that: <br />3. The petitioner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning <br />ordinance; <br />While adjusting lot lines to make one parcel larger is reasonable, it is not reasonable to leave a <br />standalone remnant parcel nearly 1 /2 the required size for the zoning district. <br />The use is not reasonable nor permitted by the zoning ordinance. <br />4. The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property not a consequence of the <br />petitioner's own action or inaction; and <br />The plight is a consequence of the petitioner's own action. They are trying to execute a lot line <br />adjustment on two conforming parcels resulting in one parcel becoming non -conforming, requiring <br />the variance. They can accomplish the same goal by platting the parcels as the city streamlined that <br />platting process in 2017. <br />5. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />The essential character of the locale could be altered if a non -conforming parcel is approved and a <br />home is built on the site. <br />Financial Impact <br />None <br />