My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1. EDSR 06-15-2020
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2014-2020
>
2020
>
06-15-2020
>
7.1. EDSR 06-15-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2020 9:36:04 AM
Creation date
6/12/2020 9:28:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
6/15/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
280
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Burnsville Development Tools Criteria and Public Financing Policy Page 7 <br />6.SUBSIDY AGREEMENT: <br />A.In granting a business assistance, if required by the Statutes, the City shall <br />enter into a subsidy agreement with the recipient that provides the following <br />information: <br />1.Wage and job goals (if applicable) <br />2.Commitment to provide necessary information for reporting purposes <br />3.Five-year operation commitment after the benefit date <br />4.Recourse for failure to meet goals required by the Statutes <br />B. The subsidy agreement may be incorporated into a broader development <br />agreement for a project. <br />C. The assistance agreement will commit the recipient to provide the reporting <br />information required by the Statutes, if any. <br />D. For assistance that does not constitute a business subsidy under the <br />Statutes, the grantee and the City or the EDA will enter into an agreement <br />setting forth the terms of the assistance. <br />7.PUBLIC FINANCING PROJECT EVALUATION PROCESS: <br />A. The following methods of analysis for all public financing proposals will be <br />used: <br />1.Project is deemed consistent with City’s Goals and Objectives <br />2.Consideration of project meeting minimum qualifications <br />3.Consideration of project meeting desired qualifications <br />4.Project meets “but-for” analysis and/or statutory qualifications <br />Please note that the evaluation methodology is intended to provide a <br />balanced review. Each area will be evaluated individually and collectively <br />and in no case should one area outweigh another in terms of importance to <br />determining the level of assistance.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.