Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />City of Elk River <br />Page 3 <br />Uncorrected misstatements (Continued) <br />The following summarizes the uncorrected misstatement of the financial statements: <br />A fire relief pension related deferred inflow of resources in the amount of $117,478 was not <br />recorded in the City's previous year's financial statements. As this is immaterial to governmental <br />activities, the City is booking the net deferred inflow of resources in 2019 and running the <br />adjustment through current year pension expense instead of restating beginning net position for <br />the immaterial prior period amount. <br />Corrected misstatements <br />None of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management <br />were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. <br />Disagreements with management <br />For purposes of this letter, a disagreement with management is a financial accounting, reporting, or <br />auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial <br />statements or the auditors' report. No such disagreements arose during our audit. <br />Management representations <br />We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management <br />representation letter dated May 26, 2020. <br />Management consultations with other independent accountants <br />In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and <br />accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation <br />involves application of an accounting principle to the City's financial statements or a determination of <br />the type of auditors' opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards <br />require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant <br />facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. <br />Significant issues discussed with management prior to engagement <br />We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and <br />auditing standards, with management each year prior to engagement as the City's auditors. However, <br />these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses <br />were not a condition to our engagement. <br />Other audit findings or issues <br />We have provided a separate letter to you dated May 26, 2020, communicating internal control related <br />matters identified during the audit. <br />Audits of group financial statements <br />We noted no matters related to the group audit that we consider to be significant to the responsibilities <br />of those charged with governance of the group. <br />Quality of component auditor's work <br />There were no instances in which our evaluation of the work of a component auditor gave rise to a <br />concern about the quality of that auditor's work. <br />Limitations on the group audit <br />There were no restrictions on our access to information of components or other limitations on the <br />group audit. <br />