My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.7 SR 06-01-2020
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2020
>
06-01-2020
>
4.7 SR 06-01-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2020 3:45:48 PM
Creation date
5/29/2020 10:16:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/1/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
301
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sherburne County Multi -Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2020 <br />patterns due to climate change may change the expected flow pattern. It is conceivable that bigger <br />rainfalls at earlier times in the year could threaten a dam's designed margin of safety, causing dam <br />operators to release greater volumes of water earlier in a storm cycle in order to maintain the required <br />margins of safety. Such early releases of increased volumes can increase flood potential downstream. <br />Climate change is adding a new level of uncertainty that needs to be considered with respect to <br />assumptions made during dam construction. <br />Vulnerability <br />Although dam regulatory authorities vary between various federal and state agencies, all authorities <br />attempt to classify dams according to the potential impacts from a dam failure or mis-operation. In <br />response to the numerous classification systems, FEMA's Interagency Committee on Dam Safety <br />created a hazard potential classification system that is adaptable to any agency's current system. Table <br />3o provides an overview of the main criteria agencies consider when determining a dam's hazard <br />potential classification. This classification system does not imply that the dam is unsafe, but rather <br />categorizes dams based on the probable loss of human life and the impacts on economic, <br />environmental, and lifeline interests (2004). <br />Table 30. Hazard Potential Classification Criteria <br />Low None expected Low and generally <br />limited to owner <br />Significant _ None expected Yes <br />Probable - one or Yes (but not <br />High more expected necessary forthis <br />classification) <br />Source: (US Army Corps of Engineers, 2008) <br />Minnesota's hazard classifications for dams are as follows: <br />• High (Class 1) - loss of life or potential serious hazards; damage to health, main highways, high - <br />value industrial or commercial properties, or major public utilities; or serious direct or indirect <br />economic loss to the public; <br />• Significant (Class 11) - possible health hazard or probable loss of high -value property; damage <br />to secondary highways, railroads or other public utilities; or limited direct or indirect economic <br />loss to the public otherthan that described in Class III (Low); and <br />• Low (Class III) - property losses restricted mainly to rural buildings and local county and <br />township roads that are an essential part of the rural transportation system serving the area <br />involved. <br />Class I dam owners are required to have an Emergency Action Plan (EAP) on file, notifying individuals <br />whose lives, property, or health may be endangered by failure, mis-operation, or other circumstances <br />affecting the dam (Minnesota Legislature - Office of the Revisor of Statutes, 2008). <br />Page187 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.