My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.2. HRSR 06-01-2020
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
HRA Packets
>
2020-2029
>
2020
>
06-01-2020
>
7.2. HRSR 06-01-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/29/2020 8:20:56 AM
Creation date
5/29/2020 8:04:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
HRSR
date
6/1/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Hillside Heights Apartments, Elk River, Minnesota <br /> <br />Market Analyst Professionals, LLC 5 April 24, 2020 <br />and to the south is a tree line obscuring the site from what appears to be a poor condition <br />residential building. A short distance south of the site is a Northstar Light Rail Station as well as <br />both Coachman Apartments and The Depot at Elk River Apartments (LIHTC projects detailed in a <br />latter section of this report) and newer residential and commercial development. <br /> <br /> The proposal is located in the city of Elk River, Minnesota, in Census Tract 305.02 of Sherburne <br />County. The PMA is defined by Census Tracts and encompasses an area northwest of Minneapolis <br />including a portion of Census Tracts located in Wright, Hennepin, Sherburne and Anoka Counties. <br />Major factors in defining the PMA were proximity to the site, socioeconomic conditions and <br />competition with surrounding areas. Specifically, the site is located in the city of Elk River near <br />the recently constructed Northstar commuter rail line. Declining proximity to the site was the <br />major factor in limiting the PMA. Specifically, the PMA extends less than 8 miles from the site in <br />all directions. Given the small geographic area it encompasses the PMA should be considered a <br />conservative estimate of demand. <br /> <br /> The most comparable projects to the proposal include general occupancy units operating under <br />income restriction guidelines within the same area as the proposal and offering similar units. <br />Among LIHTC projects those in closest proximity and considered the most comparable to the <br />subject are included—excluding more dated projects. Additionally, two market rate projects are <br />included to gauge hypothetical market rents for the subject. Detailed information on these projects <br />is presented in the following pages. The overall occupancy rate for the most comparable projects is <br />99.7 percent. The subject will offer one- to three-bedroom general occupancy units with <br />comparable amenities and unit sizes to comparable facilities. The development will be the newest <br />project in the area, commanding a premium relative to more dated competitive set projects. <br />Among competitive set projects Coachman limits rents to 50 percent AMI (for 60 percent AMI <br />income restrictions) and these units are shifted in the rent grid. Considering adjustments and <br />projections to market entry the subject’s rents are consistent with MAP’s estimated achievable <br />LIHTC rents and are appropriately positioned relative to hypothetical market. Competitive rents <br />and strong demand for affordable housing in the area offer support for the success of the proposal. <br /> <br /> Reported absorption among competitive set projects has been robust. Maple Village reported one
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.