My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6.1. SR 07-18-2005
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2005
>
07/18/2005
>
6.1. SR 07-18-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:21 AM
Creation date
7/15/2005 11:14:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
7/18/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />:(/" '-'\ <br />~ I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />-~~ <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES <br /> <br />322 King Avenue <br />Elk River, Minnesota 55330 <br />Phone (612) 441-2020 <br />Fax (612) 441-8099 <br /> <br />March 29th, 2000 <br /> <br />To: John Deitz <br /> <br />From: Bryan Adams rbi~ <br />I <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Telecommunication Antennas on Water Towers <br /> <br />As you are aware, Sprint desires to place a telecommunications antenna on one of our <br />water towers. The issue was discussed at our July 9t\ 1997 and March 14th, 2000 Elk <br />River Municipal Utilities (ERMU) Commission meetings. I have been dealing with Philip <br />Carlson, Sight Acquisition Specialist, with the Everest Group. Also attached is a letter <br />dated March 1 ih, 2000 from David Huihui of the Everest Group addressing the same <br />Issue. <br /> <br />There is no question that good cell phone communication is an attribute to Elk River. <br />Current cell phone reception in this area is marginal. The question is how can we <br />accommodate these companies while preserving our interests. I have taken a strong <br />stance to deny placing an aerial on our three active water towers for the following <br />reasons: <br />1) The parties who have antennas on the tower need access to their equipment, <br />which mean~ they need keys to the tower. ERMU will then loose control of who <br />has access to the tower and loose the security of the water system. Access to the <br />water system is obtained by roof hatches in the same area as the antennas. They <br />also require a 15' by 15' space inside or outside the tower. We do not have <br />adequate room for this. Both city and utility equipment are stored under the <br />towers. <br />2) If we let one company use the tower for antennas, we must then allow access to <br />all other telecommunication companies (AT&T, US West, Aerial, etc.). <br />3) The presence of antennas increase costs of maintenance on water towers. Cables <br />running up the dry well make it more difficult to blast and paint around. The dry <br />well is already a difficult area for painting systems. Also, water tight roof <br />penetration must be added. Another source of maintenance and painting failure. <br />4) The City and Utilities are considering a GIS system for Elk River. A GIS base <br />station would be required and the water towers provide an ideal location. <br />Interference with an existing telecommunication signal may preclude this option. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.