Laserfiche WebLink
MnDOT Contract No. 1028386 Work Order No. 1 <br />Exhibit B <br />Detailed Scope of Work and Deliverables <br /> <br />10 <br />For future condition considerations the consultant team will apply their experience with the Interactive Highway Safety <br />Design Manual suite of tools. Using the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Crash Prediction Model of the Interactive <br />Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM), the consultant team will develop a predictive safety model for TH 10 within the <br />study area. If the roadway geometric data needed for this analysis is not readily available from State or past studies, the <br />consultant team will collect the data using Google Earth and verify with Local Government/Agency and State staff. The focus <br />of the future safety evaluation will be to identify locations of potential safety concern and understand how the existing <br />roadway geometrics impact safety performance. The consultant team will use information from the base year and 2045 <br />conditions with forecasts as inputs into the IHSDM safety model. Quantitative results of the crash prediction will help <br />identify safety needs along the corridor and incorporate safety into the evaluation. <br /> <br />Access Plan <br />Given State’s access classification (1AF – transition to a freeway), along with operational and safety concerns, it is <br />anticipated that one of the key focuses will be transitioning TH 10 to a full freeway facility. Planning for access is one of the <br />most critical aspects of this study. The businesses along the corridor have a heavy stake in access to TH 10. As such, it will be <br />paramount to understand how their business needs to be supported as well as issues that these accesses cause. Under <br />future conditions, these access and safety challenges are likely to increase. The consultant team will put a significant effort <br />into understanding access needs currently and into the future and develop concepts that provide consistent, safe access as <br />well as good circulation patterns to land use. <br /> <br />The consultant team has developed an access evaluation process that provides a framework for developing a consistent <br />access strategy along a corridor and for a way to implement access strategies over time as development occurs – this <br />process has proven tremendously effective in a number of other corridor studies we have worked on. A comprehensive <br />access inventory will be developed as part of the evaluation and summarized in tabular and graphical form. This includes <br />identifying access location, access configuration (i.e., full, tee, right-in/right-out), type of access (public or private), access <br />control measures, type of usage (truck or auto), cross-street function, and presence of turn lanes. <br />The consultant team will then define the desirable access spacing based upon State’s access management guidelines, <br />corridor vision and goals, safety implications, current roadway network and context with other major facilities (i.e., ability to <br />connect and facilitate movements regionally and/ or inter-city). The consultant team will also look at past access decisions <br />including current access agreements that may be in place with area businesses or property owners. The consultant team will <br />identify this as the preferred “access template” or access goal. The preferred access template will then be overlaid onto the <br />current accesses (i.e., base conditions) to identify inconsistencies with the access spacing objectives. Each inconsistency will <br />be enumerated by type (i.e., public, private commercial, private residential, or private agriculture) and classified by <br />replacement difficulty levels. Access consolidation and/ or removal levels range from 1 (easiest to accomplish – has <br />alternative access to public street) to 3 (most difficult – generally requires purchase of access rights and/or redevelopment). <br />These inconsistencies will then be evaluated in detail to determine the alternative design solutions, potential impacts, and <br />their costs to achieve the desired spacing. <br /> <br />The final deliverable from this activity will be a set of access modification recommendations that will be incorporated in to <br />the concept alternatives in short-, mid-, and long-term timeframes.