My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-10-2020 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2020 - 2029
>
2020
>
03-10-2020 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2022 9:42:10 AM
Creation date
4/30/2020 3:10:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
3/10/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission Page 3 <br />March 10, 2020 <br />----------------------------- <br />5.2. Racin’ Repair – Jason Ryan – 14115 Ranch Rd. NW <br /> Conditional Use Permit to operate an auto repair facility, Case No. CU 20- <br />04 <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Commissioner Feinstein asked if this application needs to comply with commercial <br />fire code or the residential fire code. <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated he didn’t have an answer to that. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson-Vito stated that the state of Minnesota has one fire code that <br />spells out everything for both residential and commercial uses. <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated the city ordinance is very clear that architectural plans are <br />required for projects that are not residential homes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson-Vito asked if that was for new construction or just <br />modifications. <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated yes, an architect is required for any remodeling. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson noted the public hearing was already open. <br /> <br />Jason Ryan, 14115 Ranch Rd. NW, the applicant, stated he reviewed the conditions <br />as outlined and stated he is fine with them and they seem very clear. He stated he is <br />also curious about fire and building code requirements. He requested the Planning <br />Commission consider removing Condition 4 requiring curb and gutter and stated he <br />currently has Class 5 in place. He questioned the need for a concrete curb and apron <br />around a substance like Class 5 and wondered what was trying to be accomplished <br />with that requirement. He noted on an overhead image of his property where the <br />asphalt and Class 5 was located and wondered if there was a different type of edging <br />that could achieve the same result. <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated the curb and gutter directs stormwater that falls on the <br />property and defines parking boundaries, so creep doesn’t occur. He indicated staff <br />states this as a requirement to contain parking boundaries, but the City Council can <br />waive the curb and gutter requirement. <br /> <br />There being no one else present to speak on this item, Chair Johnson closed the <br />public hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson-Vito recommended leaving Condition 1 in place and <br />contacting the state of Minnesota for guidance on how to appropriately handle these <br />types of situations, noting you cannot deviate down from what is laid out in state <br />code. She stated she is fine removing Condition 4. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.