My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1. SR 02-03-2020
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2020
>
02-03-2020
>
7.1. SR 02-03-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2021 10:06:51 AM
Creation date
1/30/2020 3:12:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
2/3/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Copart USA Traffic Impact Study <br />Elk River, MN <br />1/14/2020 <br />Table A-1 - Level of Service vs. Control Delay - Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections (TWSC, <br />AWSC & Roundabouts) <br />TWSC, AWSC & Roundabouts <br />Control Delay per <br />LOS by Volume to <br />Vehicle <br />Capacity Ratio (< 1)* <br />(Seconds) <br />A <br /><_10 <br />B <br />>10 and <_15 <br />C <br />>15 and <_25 <br />D <br />>25 and <_35 <br />E <br />>35 and <_50 <br />F <br />>50 <br />Signalized Intersections <br />Control Delay per <br />LOS by Volume to <br />Vehicle <br />Capacity Ratio (< 1)* <br />(Seconds) <br />A <br /><_10 <br />B <br />>10 and <_20 <br />C <br />>20 and <_35 <br />D <br />>35 and <_55 <br />E <br />>55 and <_80 <br />F <br />>80 <br />Per the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board. <br />* NOTE: When LOS by Volume to Capacity Ratio >1.00, LOS is F. <br />The acceptable Level of Service threshold for a particular movement at an intersection <br />depends on both the priority assigned to that movement and its traffic volume. In general, <br />the higher the priority and the higher the traffic volume, the more stringent the acceptable <br />threshold will be. For example, the acceptable threshold for a high-priority/high-volume <br />rural movement might be C, while LOS F on a low-priority/low-volume urban movement <br />might be appropriate. <br />For two-way stop -controlled intersections, a key measure of operational effectiveness is the <br />side street LOS. Since the mainline does not have to stop, the majority of delay is attributed <br />to the side-street/minor approaches. Long delays and poor LOS can sometimes result on <br />the side street, even if the overall intersection is functioning well, making it a valuable <br />design criterion. As the side-street/minor approach delay approaches and exceeds 60 <br />seconds per vehicle, drivers may divert to another route or become impatient and accept <br />gaps in the mainline traffic that are less than acceptable/safe gaps resulting in the potential <br />for traffic safety concerns. Therefore, depending on priority and traffic volume, acceptable <br />side -street LOS can range from D to F. Side streets can operate at LOS F without the <br />intersection warranting a change in traffic control. <br />A final fundamental component of operational analyses is a study of vehicular queuing, as <br />defined the line of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. An intersection can <br />operate with an acceptable Level of Service, but if queues from the intersection extend back <br />to block entrances to turn lanes or accesses to adjacent land uses, unsafe operating <br />conditions could result. <br />22 Westwood <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.