Laserfiche WebLink
18. Submit full MIDS report. <br /> A full MIDS report will be completed during the construction documents phase. <br /> Staff will review these documents once they have been submitted. <br /> 19. Staff reserves the right to continue review of all site,grading and utilityplans. <br /> So noted <br /> Environmental: <br /> 1. MnDNR will follow up with comments regarding requirements for state floodplain and the <br /> Mississippi River Wild and Scenic and Recreational requirements. <br /> So noted <br /> Comments were received from MnDNR on January 11,2019. Please review attached letter and <br /> respond to their concerns. <br /> 2. Provide before and after hardcover calculations for the Saxon site. Ordinance limits impervious <br /> surfaces to 25% or no net increase. <br /> The preliminary plans have been updated with pre and post hardcover calculations for both <br /> projects. <br /> The plans show a 30.5%hardcover calculation,which does not meet city standards.Please <br /> verify your hardcover calculations. <br /> 3. Section 30-2022 requires a 30 foot setback from the top-of-bluff. Move structures outside of the setback. <br /> Both of these projects are proposed as a PUD which includes the flexibility of building <br /> within the 30'setback from the top of bluff. <br /> A deviation from the standard will require approval from the DNR and City Council.Any <br /> approved deviations will be memorialized in a PUD agreement. <br /> 4. Submitted plans showing the hardcover calculations. Sketches indicate the area inside the <br /> building, courtyard,will have impervious surfaces. <br /> a. If land along the river is dedicated for park use, the hardcover calculations will change. <br /> Updated plans will be required based on park recommendations. <br /> The preliminary plans have been updated with pre and post hardcover calculations for both projects. <br /> The plans do not match calculated hardcover existing/proposed numbers.The discrepancies <br /> need further explanation. <br /> 5. The proposed site does not meet setbacks from the Mississippi River, does not meet bluff <br /> setbacks and potential grading plans are concerning from an environmental standpoint. Bluff <br /> destabilization is the biggest concern overall for proposed project. There is no wetland <br /> delineation on file for this site.Any encroachment into the bluff setback or bluff area may <br /> require approval from the Department of Natural Resources.As submitted previously, there <br /> are height restriction concerns as well. Structures along the Mississippi like this may not be <br /> higher than 30 feet tall. <br /> The only proposed site improvements within the 100 foot setback from the 100 year base flood elevation <br /> boundary is the expansion of the existing stormwater basin below the bluf. The existing bluff will be protected <br /> and monitored by an independent testing company during construction.A wetland determination was completed <br /> for this site with no wetlands identi red.Height restrictions for both of theproposed buildings will be met. <br /> If hardcover is proposed within 45 feet of a suspected wetland,a wetland delineation will be <br /> required.Building elevations showing the proposed heights have not been received and will be <br />