My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.1. EDSR 12-16-2019
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2014-2020
>
2019
>
12-16-2019
>
7.1. EDSR 12-16-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2019 3:41:23 PM
Creation date
12/12/2019 3:27:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
12/16/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Evaluation of Proposals Formatted: Font: Gill Sans MT, 14 pt, Not All <br />- <br />---------------------------------------------------------------- ---' caps <br />Evaluation Criteria: The EDA will evaluate the qualifications of consultants submitting proposals based on <br />but not limited to the following criteria and will award Points in each category up to the maximum number <br />of Points listed: <br />A. Criteria <br />1. Accuracy of Proposal submission. All information requested has been <br />15 <br />submitted. The correct number of proposals has been submitted. <br />2. <br />The consultant's history, background, staffing and capabilities to <br />20 <br />complete this assignment. Personnel or sub consultants' background, <br />qualifications, demonstrated creativity and experience in the economic <br />development industry. Experience and demonstrated expertise in <br />developing a Plan for similar sized communities. <br />3. <br />Knowledge and demonstrated success in facilitation and success in <br />20 <br />integrating the concerns of local citizens, the business community, quality <br />of life issues, state transportation issues, target industries and other such <br />issues. <br />immediate eeurse eff RP -6— -41. shett, midand long ternt- <br />outlined in item L (11) of the scove of ser -v' .". Pf- T-6- <br />4. <br />Proposed methodology and timelines relative to the provision of <br />20 <br />immediate course of action with short, mid, and long-term actions as <br />5. <br />20 <br />Municipal references and samples provided for work <br />of similar scope. Knowledge and emonstrated success in fiacilitation-and <br />--- es and other sueh <br />6. <br />Project fee and per hour rate for staff sub consultants. <br />5 <br />Total <br />100 Points <br />Presentation by short-listed consultants <br />25 <br />B. Evaluation and Ranking: A group comprised of citv staff and board/council representatives shall <br />review and rank all proposals according to qualifications, and consultants may be selected for <br />interviews or oral presentations as deemed necessary by the group. The group shall make a <br />recommendation to the EDA and the city for final selection. The EDA and the city make no <br />commitment to any respondent to this RFP beyond consideration of its written response. <br />Formatted: Strikethrough <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.