My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.4. SR 11-18-2019
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2019
>
11-18-2019
>
7.4. SR 11-18-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 3:59:35 PM
Creation date
11/14/2019 3:55:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
11/18/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
General Information about City Fees <br /> The City Council can choose to set fees that fully recover the cost of service or put those fees at lower <br /> levels to provide a certain level of subsidy, or alternatively,reduce costs by reducing the level of service. <br /> There are programs and services that may justify a subsidy from a tax based or alternative revenue source. <br /> For example, community supported public services based on social, safety, or general community welfare. <br /> Services that support the general public, such as public safety, are supported by tax and other non-fee <br /> revenues,while services more elective in nature and of specific benefit to individuals are typically <br /> supported by charging fees to the user. <br /> Within the services that are typically funded by user fees, there are several reasons a City Council may not <br /> advocate for full cost recovery of services. The following factors are some key policy considerations when <br /> setting fees at less than 100 percent of cost recovery: <br /> ■ Encouragement of desired behaviors. Keeping fees for certain services below full cost recovery <br /> may provide better compliance from the community. For example,if the cost of a permit for a <br /> residential tree removal is higher than the cost of the actual removal of the tree,many citizens will <br /> avoid getting the permit. <br /> ■ Effect on demand for a particular service. Sometimes raising the "price" charged for services <br /> might reduce the number of participants in a program. This is largely the case in recreation programs <br /> such as camps or enrichment classes,where participants often compare the city's fees to surrounding <br /> jurisdictions or other options for leisure activities. <br /> ■ Benefit received by user of the service and the community at large is mutual. Many services <br /> that directly benefit a group or individual equally benefit the community as a whole. Examples <br /> include recreation programs,planning design review, historical dedications, and certain types of <br /> special events. <br /> Who Benefits Type of Service Tax v Fees Policy Example Services <br /> Community Public 100% taxes Police patrol <br /> Primarily the community with Public/Private Mostly taxes and some Code enforcement <br /> some individual benefits fees <br /> Primarily individual with some Private/Public Mostly fees and some Youth sports <br /> community wide benefits taxes <br /> Individual benefit only Private 100% fees Development services <br /> When reviewing fees a City Council keeps in mind which fees should be supported and subsidized and <br /> which should be privately paid. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.