My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES (1 SET) 10-21-2019
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2019
>
10-21-2019
>
4.1. DRAFT MINUTES (1 SET) 10-21-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2019 2:56:12 PM
Creation date
10/17/2019 2:56:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
10/21/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Minutes Page 10 <br />October 7, 2019 <br />----------------------------- <br />Senator Mary Kiffmeyer noted the plans aren’t final and expressed concern with <br />closing the Line Avenue access on Main Street and the area businesses but she would <br />like to see a larger map highlighting the impacts. She asked Council how the city <br />would survive during construction and how the side roads would handle traffic. <br /> <br />10.4 Sewer Service Extension Outside of Urban Service Area <br /> <br />Mr. Femrite presented the staff report outlining the policy questions to be <br />rd <br />considered. He discussed the request from Windsor Park 3 Addition residents <br />wanting to consider sewer service extension to their neighborhood. He stated a <br />feasibility study is needed and would cost about $9,000. He discussed the differing <br />funding options. <br /> <br />Mayor Dietz questioned whether everyone in the development would agree to the <br />extension and its payment. <br /> <br />Mr. Femrite stated Council could offer up the ability to utilize the 429 Assessment <br />Process and those who are opposed could appeal their assessment at that time. <br /> <br />Mayor Dietz asked about the cost of hiring someone to show benefit if there are <br />appeals. <br /> <br />Mr. Femrite stated Council could decide not to move forward with the assessment if <br />they feel there are too many appeals. He further stated if Council is comfortable with <br />moving forward a solution could be worked out to have the development cover the <br />cost of the appeals. He stated utilizing this process puts the city in the position of <br />looking like the bad guy when really it would be the conduit to help the development <br />out of their situation. <br /> <br />There was discussion about whether water hookup should be required but staff <br />noted it should be on a case-by-case basis depending on certain factors, such as <br />costs, need, and distance from urban service district. <br /> <br />Mr. Femrite explained typical ownership of a city collection system versus a private <br />system. He stated he would review these differently because it isn’t a conventional <br />system the city maintains and therefore there are no engineering standards for them. <br />He stated in this case he would recommend public ownership start at the connection <br />where their treatment plant is located and the homeowner’s association would own <br />the existing collection system pass their properties. <br /> <br />Councilmember Westgaard stated this seems to be a reasonable request and there is <br />some logic to expanding the sewer beyond the current urban service district, noting <br />it’s not a leap frog jump like some other developments may fall into. He stated he’d <br />like to see the cost estimates for the homeowners. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.