My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2.0. SR 06-27-2005
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2005
>
06/27/2005 - SPECIAL
>
2.0. SR 06-27-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:20 AM
Creation date
6/24/2005 10:24:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/27/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Item #6.9.c. <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />TO: Catherine Mehelich, Director of Economic Development <br /> <br />FROM: Chris Le:seberg, Planner ~ <br />DATE: May I 6, 2005 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Design Review of Jackson Place and The Bluffs of Elk River <br /> <br />Overview <br /> <br />Staff met with the applicant on April 18, 2005 to give feedback on the proposed designs for <br />both Jackson Place and The Bluffs of Elk River. <br /> <br />Putpose <br /> <br />The intent of the Downtown district is to preserve this distinctive character with the <br />appearance that there ate multiple buildings that are distincrly different from .one another yet <br />allow a uniform mass of building with the appearance of vertical separati9n. <br /> <br />Jackson Place <br /> <br />Staff felt the "end units" of this building facir?-g J ackson Avenue and Main Street are done <br />exceptionally well and interact with the existing architecture across the street and meet the <br />District's intent. They look like buildings in a small town downtown- <br /> <br />The biggest concern raised with this building is the overall mass of it. . The entire roof line <br />has no change in height and about half of the cornice does not have an articulated design. <br />Design applications are implemented in the building between the "end units" (mid section) <br />that tries to create the feel of different height buildings ~th a change in material, but that <br />alone is not enough. The guidelines indicate that "Cornice heights. . . vary in height from unit <br />to unit by at least 24 inches." Staff recommended that both "end units" have the cornice <br />height .raised by at least 24 inches to help create the appearance of different buildings. This <br />recommendation should not affect any of the interior space or stroCtuIal integrity of the <br />building. <br /> <br />The repetitive "mid section" should try to create some variation to meet the intent. This <br />could be accomplished with color/material changes and/or changes in comice design and <br /> <br />Planning Department Mission: the orderly development of a livable and sustainable Elk River community. . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.