Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Page 7 <br />September 24, 2019 <br />----------------------------- <br />Rick Haugland, the applicant, stated the house on the property will be moved off <br />site, offering a more attractive appearance of the property from the highway. He <br />stated this updated site plan offers plenty of parking but indicated his need to build a <br />much larger building to store all his equipment. He stated his plan is to level the <br />property before this winter and begin building the new structure in the spring. <br /> <br />There being no one else to speak, Chair Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rydberg asked if a condition could be added that required the <br />applicant to move the residence before building construction begins. <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated the Planning Commission could add a condition with a time <br />frame of removal of the residence if they so wished. <br /> <br />Chair Johnson asked the applicant if it was his intent to comply with the condition of <br />removing the home before the building begins. <br /> <br />Mr. Haugland stated if they wanted to add a condition that when the building is <br />completed, the house will be removed, he would be fine with that. <br /> <br />Commissioner Feinstein asked if it would be as simple as submitting a demolition or <br />reconstruction plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg suggested that before issuing a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) and <br />allowing the building to be used, the residential structure would have to be removed <br />if the applicant would agree. <br /> <br />Mr. Haugland stated it may take about 1.5 years to complete to allow time to build <br />and relocate his folks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Beise reiterated the condition of issuing the CO and meaning the <br />building couldn’t be used until the house is removed. <br /> <br />Mr. Haugland stated he would agree to that. <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated they would add a condition as follows: A Certificate of <br />Occupancy would not be issued until the residential structure has been removed <br />from the property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson-Vito asked if Condition #2 would cover the concern of the <br />residential dwelling not being used. <br /> <br />Commissioner Rydberg stated it impacts the parking spaces and some of the other <br />permits on the property and he felt it’s making sure the intent of what we have is <br />already followed. <br /> <br /> <br />