Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission Page 4 <br />September 24, 2019 <br />----------------------------- <br />Peter Warner, 620 Gates Ave., submitted a handwritten letter from another <br />property owner, Larry Krieg, who couldn’t attend the public hearing. Mr. Warner <br />also submitted his own photos of the condition of the applicant’s property and <br />expressed his concerns with the health hazard to the neighborhood from the rabbits <br />and their waste, and the vermin he thinks will eventually show up. He stated he <br />cannot trust the applicant to comply with the condition of keeping the rabbit cages <br />clean as they don’t currently keep them clean. <br /> <br />th <br />Carol Heath, 520 7 St., stated she has called the city numerous times and talked to <br />Code Enforcement Officer Dave Hetrick, who visited the applicant’s property and <br />took pictures. She stated the yard wasn’t cleaned up but only seemed to get worse. <br /> <br />Dale Ziner, 617 Gates Ave. NW, the person who lives at the property and cares for <br />the rabbits. His father is the applicant. He stated he now does twice weekly cleanings <br />of the rabbit cages. He stated he contacts a farmer from Foreston who stops twice a <br />week to pick up the wheelbarrow of rabbit waste. He stated he is trying to sell the <br />truck in the driveway but is having title issues. <br /> <br />Mr. Whiteoak stated the applicant’s Chevy truck is on jacks and has been on the <br />property for 15 years. <br /> <br />There being no one to speak, Chair Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson-Vito asked about records of existing or on-going code <br />violations reported with the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg stated he did speak to Mr. Hetrick for an update on the code <br />enforcement efforts at the property, and the yard upkeep is a separate issue that is <br />being dealt with. He apologized to the neighbors that the cleanup efforts haven’t <br />been as quick as they would have liked and explained a few years ago, the city didn’t <br />have a mechanism for prohibitin rabbits, which is why the code changed to include <br />rabbits as a domestic animal. He stated they have received many phone calls about <br />this property in particular and therefore they are requesting the applicant to obtain a <br />CUP. He stated dealing with blighted properties is not a simple overnight process <br />but also shouldn’t take years either. He stated a game plan for cleanup of the <br />property will be included to the council information, which is separate from the <br />CUP. <br /> <br />Commissioner Larson-Vito stated she felt the condition of the property and the <br />keeping of rabbits are related and asked if existing codes aren’t being followed, she <br />asked why the Planning Commission would have any reason to believe the <br />conditions set forth in the CUP would be mitigated in this instance. <br /> <br />Mr. Leeseberg agreed the two items are related but believed the CUP cannot legally <br />be denied because the applicant’s grass isn’t mowed or because there’s a truck in the <br />front yard. <br /> <br /> <br />