Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. ~ <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ELK RIVER <br /> <br />RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PASSAGE OF THE <br />"MINNESOTA EMERGING COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES <br />ACT OF 1995" <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Elk River is responsible for monitoring the operation <br />and activities of cable communications in the City, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City provides coordination of administration and <br />enforcement of the cable franchise; promotes the development of locally <br />produced television programming; and conducts such other activities to <br />ensure equitable and reasonable rates and service levels for the citizens of <br />City, and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, it is the intent of the cable franchise to ensure the development <br />and continued operation of a cable communications system so that the City <br />may achieve better utilization and improvement of public services and <br />contributes significantly to the communication needs of its residents, and <br /> <br />e WHEREAS, in pursuit of these goals the City has granted to private interests <br />the use of Public Property and Public Right-of-Way. <br /> <br />NO\V THEREFORE, at a regular meeting of the Elk River City Council dated <br />March 6,1995, the City endorses the "Minnesota Emerging Communications <br />Services Act of 1995" and encourages its adoption by the Minnesota State <br />Legislature for the following reasons: <br /> <br />FINDINGS <br /> <br />1. Public Property and Public Rights-of-Way are valuable public assets <br />and Local Authorities are entitled to ensure that the public is benefitted, <br />compensated, protected and able to access and share in the use of any <br />Emerging Communications Services that makes use of those Public Rights-of- <br />Way by a private for-profit provider. <br /> <br />2. There is a wide range of Persons seeking to use Public Property and <br />the Public Rights-of-Way to deliver video, voice and data services and all <br />such Persons should be treated similarly by State and Local Authorities. <br /> <br />e 3. Existing state statutes do not adequately address these Emerging <br />Communications Services. <br />