My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.3. SR 06-20-2005
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2000 - 2010
>
2005
>
06/20/2005
>
7.3. SR 06-20-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:19 AM
Creation date
6/17/2005 8:38:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/20/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />federal ADA access requirements. Mr. Danielson noted that the FTA has been <br />tightening their literal interpretation of ADA rules. <br /> <br />7. On behalf of Steve Apanian, Mr. Stevens gave the update on Advanced and Final <br />Design of the LRT connection. He noted that some of the issues being addressed are <br />the Sth street alignment (north side or south side) and the proposed ball park. There is a <br />meeting scheduled for next Tuesday at Hennepin County with Hennepin County folks, <br />people from the City of Minneapolis and HOK (company from St. Louis that has been <br />retained to design the stadium). Staff will bring more information to the NCDA in the <br />coming months as this issue moves forward. <br /> <br />8) Paul Danielson gave an overview of the PE Validation Review Process. Part of the <br />process is to identify issues that need further consideration and any impacts to code <br />changes (building codes and sustainable design). Findings of the process will be <br />presented at the June meeting. Major issues are: vehicle type, ADA access, Big Lake <br />Station location, Coon Rapids track crossing, Fridley access configuration, downtown <br />station (stadium impacts), operator determination, systems design (operator/central <br />control location), BNSF communication and platform design changes. <br /> <br />9) Mark Fuhrmann reported on information from the FT A regarding the "Dear Colleague" <br />letter which reviewed suggested changes in the FT A New Starts process. The FT A <br />administrator, Jenna Dorn, has issued her decision regarding the FTA's New Starts <br />process. Ms. Dorn's letter noted that the FT A would be moving forwards with three <br />suggestions: an inflation adjustor to adjust the cost effectiveness thresholds that <br />currently exist in their rating process; allowance for projects to use 2030 policy <br />decisions; and instituting standardized cost categories which will be more prescriptive of <br />what can or cannot be included in a cost category. <br /> <br />10) Mark Fuhrmann gave an update on the Project Schedule and its key milestones. He <br />noted that the Project Management Plan has been completed and will be a part of the <br />submittal to the FT A. <br /> <br />11) Mary Richardson gave an update on State legislative action. She noted that there has <br />been a lot of discussion on the transportation bill, nothing firm to report. <br /> <br />12) Jon Olson gave an update on federal legislative activities. He noted that he and others <br />had visited Washington in April and that support for the Northstar Project is very strong. <br /> <br />13) Todd Rapp gave an update on public information activities. He noted that Governor <br />Pawlenty had signed the transportation bonding bill. Four things need to be done: make <br />sure that supporters and others understand that more funding will be. needed in 2006, <br />communicate progress the Project makes over the next several months, make sure <br />there are no surprises, keep legislators and others informed, and continue to engage <br />new residents in this fast growing corridor. <br /> <br />Jill Brown noted that the Commuter Coach demo project had its SOO,OOOth rider in April. <br />A survey of people riding the bus was completed: 7S% of riders responded and only one <br />person noted their dissatisfaction that the bus was too crowded. <br /> <br />14) There being no further business, John Norgren made a motion that the meeting be <br />adjourned. The motion was seconded by Ewald Peterson and passed unanimously on a <br />voice vote. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.