Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />May 28, 2019 <br />Page 9 <br />Keith Eberl, 19091 Zebulon St. NW — stated he lives next door to the applicant and <br />doesn't feel this is that big of an issue. He hears other dogs in the neighborhood on a <br />daily basis. <br />Renee Rohde, 19091 Zebulon St. NW— stated she also lives next door to the <br />applicant and explained she has heard dogs barking but has never even seen her two <br />big dogs and never hears the dogs barking inside the applicant's house. She stated <br />she has never felt afraid or intimated to knock on her door. She requested to <br />consider all the dogs in the neighborhood and not just her dogs. <br />There being no one else to speak, Chair Johnson closed the public hearing. <br />Commissioner Larson -Vito explained the approval of the CUP follows the property, <br />not the person applying, and she always considers who may be living at this property <br />in 10 years. On that basis, she is recommending denial because it's cumbersome to <br />enforce and that burden shouldn't be placed on the neighbors. She stated even if it's <br />on a rural property and some have been approved, it comes down to regulations 1 <br />and 5 not being met. <br />Chair Johnson stated even if the conditions are not being met or an ordinance is <br />violated, the CUP can be revoked. He explained he feels some safeguards are in <br />place and it's a situation that already exists today and they are asking it be brought <br />into compliance. He stated it's tough when there are no police complaints and has a <br />hard time justifying a denial based on the feedback they've received. <br />Commissioner Rydberg stated he agrees with Commissioner Larson -Vito, basically <br />expanding what the normal household rules are and the Planning Commission has a <br />duty to review that. He stated he hasn't heard overwhelming support of the <br />mitigation of the animals. He didn't feel this was an appropriate CUP for this <br />neighborhood. <br />Commissioner Feinstein stated there have also been positive comments from <br />neighbors. <br />Commissioner Thiel stated this CUP gives more protection in a way than someone <br />with 5 very noisy dogs, without a CUP, and was in support of approving the CUP. <br />Commissioner Larson -Vito asked how Code Enforcement will document these <br />conditions and realistically what does compliance look like. She stated she wondered <br />that with a lot of things that have conditions and what would Peter Beck say. <br />Mr. Carlton stated this would be a great conversation to have with Peter Beck. He <br />stated a condition could be added for 6 annual inspections. He stated a lot of our <br />codes are up to either city staff or a resident witnessing a violation. He said having <br />these conditions in place gives us the mechanism to stop by and monitor the <br />property to inspect and verify they are being complied with beyond the norm. <br />PIwee[I Ir <br />NATURE <br />