Laserfiche WebLink
Updated 7/18/18 <br /> <br /> <br />6 <br />6) Impact of temporary work - Describe how temporary works of public art will continue to have an impact in the <br />community after the work is no longer present. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />DEMONSTRATED NEED – 9 of 30 points <br />Evaluators use the following criteria when reviewing this section of the application: <br />1. The public art project is well designed to address the identified community/audience's specific interests and circumstances, as <br />understood by both the applicant and the community. <br />2. Evidence demonstrates that community members, organizations, and partners want to engage in the project activities, and are <br />willing to invest through commitment of time, money, and/or in-kind goods and services. 
 <br />3. Accessibility needs of participants and/or audiences are understood and well addressed. <br />4. Evidence demonstrates that the project provides an arts opportunity that would not otherwise be available for the identified <br />community/audience. <br /> <br /> <br />7) Describe the group(s) that will benefit from the public art project and how it will serve their needs. Consider <br />demographic factors such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age and gender. <br />a. Presenters/creators (artists, actors, performers, etc.) <br />b. Audience (patrons, students, etc.) - population/community that will live/work near and experience <br />the art as well as any other groups that will be served by this public art project. <br /> <br /> <br />8) Describe how the need for the public art project was determined - Examples include surveys, community <br />meetings, audience feedback, local and regional studies, etc. <br /> <br /> <br />9) List ways in which the community has demonstrated support for the public art project – Examples include <br />financial contributions, volunteer time, donation of services/supplies/space, survey responses, etc. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />OUTCOMES AND EVALUATION- 6 of 30 points <br />Evaluators use the following criteria when reviewing this section of the application: <br />1. Proposal outcomes describe measurable and achievable change in knowledge, attitude, skill, behavior, or condition among the <br />people the project is designed to benefit. <br />2. The evaluation plan includes appropriate methods to measure and document project
completion, effectiveness, and progress <br />toward stated outcome(s). <br />3. The evaluation plan identifies how evaluation results will be used to improve current or future programming (e.g., adjustments to <br />the project, informing future programming, sharing with stakeholders or peers, applicant learning and development, etc.). 
 <br /> <br /> <br />10) Measurable Outcomes - Once the public art project is complete, what are the expected specific measurable <br />outcomes? Explain what success will look like, what will change, what learning may take place, etc. <br /> <br />11) Evaluation Methods - Describe the evaluation methods that will be used to measure the proposed outcomes. <br /> <br />12) Reflection and Action - Describe how your organization will utilize the information obtained from evaluation. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />