Laserfiche WebLink
Any AIS management should be accompanied by regular lake vegetation surveys, and with the guidance of <br />the DNR's Aquatic Invasive Species Program. <br />It is important to recognize that although CLP is invasive, this plant is still beneficial to fish and wildlife, <br />especially in the early spring when it may be the only plant that can provide cover, habitat, and foraging <br />areas. A balance of managing plant communities and nuisance vegetation should be carefully considered. <br />Overall, lakes need aquatic vegetation for a variety of ecological purposes and it would not be favorable to <br />remove the majority of vegetation without implementing restoration efforts, especially if the stated goals <br />are to improve wildlife habitat, improve algal growth, promote fishing, reduce erosion, and improve water <br />quality. Some vegetation is preferable to no vegetation, even if that vegetation is CLP. <br />The petition also states that the LID will engage in additional actions to monitor, manage, and prevent <br />additional AIS infestations. These actions include contracting for AIS inspections at the public boat <br />landing, educating property owners and lake users about AIS detection and prevention. The DNR strongly <br />supports these practices. The most efficient way to manage AIS is to address it early, before it rises to <br />nuisance levels. Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum; EWM) is present in four basins in Lake <br />nrnnn'c iinctraam watarcharl [Ria Faala I ittla File and Mitrhall I nleac• all in rhorhimno r'niintvl cn FSA/nn <br />could get into Lake Orono as well. The DNR encourages the LID to work with the City of Elk River, <br />Sherburne County, and local DNR Watercraft Inspection Program staff to promote these additional <br />activities. <br />The DNR cautions the proposers that AIS growth is lower than it could be. Most of the lake is less than 15 <br />feet deep, and therefore theoretically capable of having vegetation growth. Current vegetation <br />distribution is limited by the lake's low water clarity, but if water quality improves and clarity increases, it <br />may spark increased vegetation growth, including CLP. If this occurs, the LID should remember that this <br />may be a consequence of improved water quality and not necessarily negative. The LID should therefore <br />continue to work very closely with the DNR Aquatic Invasive Species Program to ensure that any AIS <br />management remains in balance with overall water quality improvement goals. <br />The LID should contact the local Aquatic Invasive Species specialist Christine Jurek <br />(christine.iurek@state.mn.us, 320-223-7847) for further guidance on AIS management. <br />Native Vegetation Management <br />The LID proposes to manage native aquatic vegetation and algae, should these rise to nuisance levels. The <br />DNR recognizes that management of nuisance levels of native vegetation is sometimes necessary for <br />navigation or recreational purposes, but in Lake Orono, reduction of native plant overgrowth may not be <br />necessary or beneficial. The majority of the areas where plant growth is common are areas that are less <br />than five feet in depth and are not ideal for recreation due to these shallow depths. These areas should be <br />maintained for habitat instead. In addition, the removal of native aquatic plants may result in more algal <br />growth and an increase in turbidity in the water and is thus inconsistent with plans to reduce algae <br />proliferation and improve water quality. <br />The dredging plans may also have adverse impacts on the lake's native plant community. Many of the <br />areas targeted for dredging may include floating -leaf or emergent vegetation that provides high quality <br />DNR Advisory Report on Lake Orono Lake Improvement District Page 6 <br />