My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.5. SR 06-17-2019
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2019
>
06-17-2019
>
7.5. SR 06-17-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2019 9:42:34 AM
Creation date
6/13/2019 10:41:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
6/17/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Scott Lillestrand <br />12426193 rd Lane NW <br />Elk River, MN 55330 <br />(763) 607-2475 <br />slillestrand@Rmail.com <br />Variance Narrative <br />RECEIVED <br />APR 2 6 2019 <br />I, Scott Lillestrand, the owner of 12426 193rd Lane NW Elk River, MN 55330 am requesting a variance <br />from 10 feet to 7.5 feet on the "Garage side" side -yard setback of the property line for the construction <br />of a deck. Thank you for your time and considering this request. <br />The variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance. <br />The general purpose and intent of side yard setbacks is to keep structures reasonably separated <br />for safety and aesthetic reasons. The garage side setback requirement is 5 -feet. Currently, the <br />garage of my home is 5.5 -feet from the side property line. The proposed variance request would <br />place the new deck construction 7.5 feet from the property line. That is 2 -feet further away from <br />the property line than the existing garage. This new addition would not further encumber access <br />to the side yard as the garage is already ata 2 -foot shorter distance to the lot line than the <br />proposed deck construction location. In theory, the garage could be extended further into the <br />back yard at 5 -feet from the property line without issue. A deck would be far less imposing to <br />the general purpose and intent of this ordinance and I would conclude that it would be safer as <br />well. One could also conjecture that a deck is also better than a garage aesthetically speaking. <br />There are no utilities located in the area of the proposed deck construction. <br />The variance is consistent with the City of Elk River comprehensive plan. <br />The property is guided for residential and decks are allowed in residential districts. It is <br />consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />The petitioner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the <br />zoning ordinance; <br />Under the current zoning ordinance, I could extend and/or construct a garage 5 -feet from the <br />property line. I find it reasonable to think that a deck in this same area to the lot line would not <br />make any more negative impact to the spirit of the zoning ordinance than a garage. The garage <br />is already encumbering an area 5.5 -feet from the property line and the proposed deck location <br />would encumber less than the current garage by an additional 2 -feet. <br />The plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the property not a <br />consequence of the petition's own action or inaction; and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.