Laserfiche WebLink
The Honorable Mayor Dietz <br />City Council Members <br />City of Elk River <br />May 30, 2019 <br />Page 2 <br />invasive species remediation, lake water quality improvement and fishery habitat management. <br />By being on Elk River, these landowners are not experiencing any issues regarding <br />sedimentation, curly weed infestation, and their water quality is fairly consistent — having more <br />to do with weather conditions than lake conditions, sediment or invasive species. As such, they <br />do not stand to benefit in a significant way from inclusion in the OLID. <br />Of additional significant concern is the inequitable tax implications relative to fees and <br />assessments levied as a result of the OLID. The assessments appear to be assessed based upon <br />the individual lots, and not on frontage owned. Many of my clients own multiple small lots on <br />Elk River and, as submitted, the petition would obligate them to bear an unfair burden. It <br />would be inequitable to bill a lot owner who owns two (2) forty (40) foot lots double the <br />assessment of a lot owner having one thousand (1,000) feet of shoreline. A cursory review of <br />the "Petition Requesting The Elk River City Council to Form an Orono Lake Improvement <br />District" form shows that there is no disclosure of the financial affects of forming the OLID, nor <br />is it disclosed how the assessment would be allocated among land owners (Exhibit B to the <br />Petition). Said disclosure may have had a significant affect on the number of signatories. <br />Also, the same form has two signature lines. In disclosing the percentages of land owning <br />signors (see "Petition Signature Totals") there is no breakdown as to whether multiple land <br />owners of the same land signed, or if the percentage of the total lots to be included. This is <br />important as, similar to my client, many lot owners own multiple lots for a single residence. <br />This information provided appears to be incomplete at best, and the form provided to the <br />landowners may be misleading, without the inclusion of financial and assessment information. <br />The Sample Initial Budget included within the LOIA's petition cites a five-year $905.48 annual <br />assessment to lakeshore property owners. This assessment would be levied to each individual <br />property owner regardless of individual property values and lake frontages. The budget goes on <br />to account for such itemizations as miscellaneous office supplies and website maintenance <br />fees. The property owners I represent find these assessments patently unfair. It would appear <br />as if the planned expenditures would be undertaken to enhance the value of the landowners <br />whose lots have invasive species or the depth at the end of their docks is now insufficient as a <br />result of silt. While my clients are sympathetic, these costs should be borne by those whose <br />land is affected by the maladies complained of and who chose their living accommodations <br />accordingly. <br />We respectfully request that the Elk River property owners be excluded from any proposed <br />OLID and that should the Elk River City Council approve the OLID, the map be amended to show <br />the river lots excluded therefrom and any obligations thereunder. <br />