My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.5. SR 06-03-2019
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2019
>
06-03-2019
>
4.5. SR 06-03-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/31/2019 7:36:13 AM
Creation date
5/30/2019 3:24:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
6/3/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Request for Proposals <br />2019 Twin Lakes Road/ Yate Street Extension Page 4 of 6 <br />- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - <br /> <br />N:\Departments\Public Works\Engineering\$IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS\2019 Improvement Projects\TLR <br />Extension\RFP and Proposals\2019 TLR-Yale Street Design-ROW-Survey RFP - Draft.doc <br />b. Hourly rates for all consultant employees who are expected to work on <br />this project. These rates shall be the agreed upon costs for any additional <br />services requested by the City of Elk River, above what is detailed in the <br />scope of this RFP. <br />c. Reimbursable costs including detail of service or item and applicable <br />charge per unit. <br />d. Not to Exceed cost for the project. <br /> <br />Proposals that do not include a ‘Not to Exceed’ cost will be disregarded with no further <br />consideration. It is the responsibility of the proposing firm to accurately predict the <br />amount of time that they will need to spend on all design and construction services for <br />the project. <br /> <br />8. Insurance Certificate <br />Indicate ability to provide all necessary insurance certificates. <br /> <br />SECTION 4: CONSULTANT SELECTION <br /> <br />Proposals will be reviewed and evaluated by a team of City staff on the basis of the following <br />criteria: <br /> <br />1. Consulting firm and key project staff experience with similar projects to this. In <br />addition to understanding technical issues and having sound technical/ <br />engineering expertise, the Consultant must also have an awareness and <br />understanding of the social/political issues that can surround projects of this <br />nature, and must possess the personal and leadership skills necessary to navigate <br />the project through the public process. <br />2. Proven successful design of projects of this nature is required. This includes the <br />effective coordination and management of private and public utilities, <br />contractors, adjacent property owners, and other stakeholders. <br />3. Proven track record in successfully completing similar projects on time and <br />within budget. Successful experience of both the firm itself and the individual <br />team members will be considered. <br />4. Proposed approach to completing the project <br />5. Proposed consultant cost <br /> <br />Following review of the Proposals, only selected Consultants will be asked to make oral <br />presentations of their proposals to City representatives. Upon conclusion of the <br />presentations, staff will select a Consultant to negotiate a contract as follows: <br /> <br />1. If, for any reason, a firm is not able to commence the services in that firm’s <br />Proposal within 30 days of the award, the City reserves the right to contract with <br />another qualified firm. <br />2. The City shall not be liable for any expenses incurred by the Consultant prior to <br />the signing of a contract including, but not limited to, the Proposal preparation, <br />attendance at interviews, or final contract negotiations.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.