4.3. PCSR 05-28-2019 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

concerns, we could have made the effort to bring understanding to you and made a difference so you would have not been "miserable". You did not afford us that opportunity. But I sincerely apologize you suffered, I also suffered so did others, no one is suffering now. Current facts go a long way in healing old wounds. QUOTE: Getting back to the point, we don't care if neighbors have private kennels, a horse corral, satanic cults, car shows, massive stashes of narcotics, etc... not my business. Please stay out of ours and possibly refrain from constantly littering on our property? The problem is this: I don't think these people care, and I can only assume the dog noise issue will increase. If that happens, we'll be even more miserable here and likely move. More likely, the next folks to live in our house will raise hell with these neighbors and cause a war like any reasonable neighbor should be doing. I refuse to raise issue with them for fear of retaliation, and at the end of the day we just want to be left alone. if the neighbors can have their private kennel, quit littering and keep the disturbance to the current level of obnoxious, I say go for it 0. 1) Accusations are a thing that should be thought through thoroughly, they have no basis in fact and sarcasm such as this does nothing to further an actual resolution, however they go a long way in deformation of character and calling attention to one's true nature. This OP ED has now raised concern, I did not prior have, for the safety of my animals and the people on my property at any given time. 2) The mention of war shows true intent of this Op ED from this "neighbor". The previous mention of "restraining" his Wife from proposed assault speaks to the same intent. "fear of retaliation" serves to show justification for their proposed Intent. 3) No cult here, Roman Catholics. 4) No horse corrals, No Car shoes, No narcotic stashes, no drinking or drug use either. 5) Just the desire to continue to care for the present animals we took responsibility for, for the extent of their lifespan we were able to provide them through their rescue. I received this email through Chris Leeseberg/ City planning 5/24. 1 promptly took property pictures the same time as receiving it when I returned home. Perspective pictures from street, view of our property from their property. Their property from our property. The entirety of our private back yard, my family's property across the street, the "security light" complained about, and the 4 ft of our property line outside the fence on the North side. As well as pictures of several items of trash that we picked up while walking that property line that were not ours. They are products we do not purchase therefore we do not produce. The exception was a bird house fallen and damaged off of our fence from the last rainstorm we just had. My OP ED re the subject: Fact, in 20141 finally managed to successfully divorce an individual that happened to be a methamphetamine addict. It was a very long process to that victory. It was a success gained after years of attempting to receive assistance from Police. Outside intervention resources, civil court retraining orders and failure to overcome his police "friendly informant" status. At the time of the divorce he was granted 2 years access to the garage on the property which resulted in an unforeseen consequence, He and another individual literally barricaded themselves in the back garage on the property. The legal battle and attempted involvement of police to assist continued. Unfortunately, meth addicts have no respect for property, others, or laws. Including but not limited to: bobcat usage in the middle of the night, pointless fidgeting projects of building retaining walls in the middle of the night, break ins of my own home, theft, destruction of property, annoyances beyond comprehension including deterioration of property, driving for years with no license with no consequences from being caught. Sadly, my life was threatened after an Elk River officer informed my ex-husband, I was the one who reported his activities and in exchange for "potential information leading to a bigger fish" for the officer. Out of this fear, after an extensive legal maneuver I obtained an