Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 13: Average Number of Medical Treatment Cases for 2018 by Group <br /> 50 <br /> 45 43.40 <br /> 40 <br /> m <br /> U 35 <br /> 0 <br /> a3 30 <br /> 25 <br /> rn 20 <br /> T. <br /> cu 15 10.63 <br /> 10 <br /> 5 1.71 2.66 <br /> 0.06 0.46 0.51 0.86 <br /> 0 <br /> A B C D E F G H <br /> Figure 14: Average Number of Total Cases for 2018 by Group <br /> 100 <br /> 88.20 <br /> 90 <br /> 80 <br /> 70 <br /> O 60 <br /> m <br /> • 50 <br /> 40 <br /> • 30 25.81 <br /> 20 <br /> 7.06 <br /> 10 0.86 1.02 2.17 3.27 <br /> 0 min <br /> 0.24 . <br /> A B C D E F G H <br /> While systems with more worker-hours tend to have lower incidence rates (see Figure 10), they <br /> are also more likely to have higher average numbers of cases (days away from work, restricted <br /> or job transfer, and/or medical treatment). More worker-hours of exposure create more <br /> opportunities for incidents to occur; likewise, a utility with fewer worker-hours (employees) is <br /> likely to have fewer cases than one with more worker-hours (employees). <br /> In the "Time Charges" section of the entry form, utilities record the cumulative days from cases <br /> that resulted in days away from work or restricted duty for all employees. When assigned, these <br /> days can be taken by employees, or mandated by managers, and can be due to either injuries <br /> or illnesses. As expected, Figures 15 and 16 show that the average number of days away <br /> increases as electrical worker-hours increase. <br /> 2018 American Public Power Association's Safety Awards of Excellence Report Page 11 <br /> 408 <br />