My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.2. SR 04-15-2019
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2019
>
04-15-2019
>
7.2. SR 04-15-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2019 8:27:17 AM
Creation date
4/12/2019 8:15:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
SR
date
4/15/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
development along Tyler Street as without the transfer outlot A would not have access to a public street. <br /> The city will retain ownership of the remaining two outlots. <br /> Applicable Regulation <br /> Plat approval may only be ordered if the following findings have been made,as outlined in Section 30-375: <br /> 7. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the honing regulations (article VI of this chapter) and conforms in all respects <br /> with all requirements of this Code, including the honing regulations and this article. <br /> The two parcels owned by the applicant are zoned R-1c and the city owned lot is zoned PUD.The buildable <br /> lot and outlot A will continue be zoned R-1c,the city lots will continue to be zoned PUD.The minimum lot <br /> sizes are met for the buildable lot,but the accessory structures currently located on Lots 1 and 2,Block 1, <br /> Ilstrup Addition will need to be removed as they would be located on oudot A under the new plat. <br /> Accessory structures may not be located on a property without a principal use,home, and it will need to <br /> be removed. All other standards of the ordinance are satisfied. <br /> 2. The proposed subdivision is consistent with all applicable general and specialised city, county, and regional plans, including <br /> but not limited to, the city's comprehensive development plan. <br /> The proposed subdivision does not conflict with any city, county, or regional plans,including the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. The subdivision sets up future residential development opportunities,which is <br /> supported by city plans. <br /> 3. The physical characteristics of the site, including but not limited to topography, soils, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and <br /> siltation, susceptibility to flooding and drainage are suitable for the type and density of development and uses contemplated. <br /> The proposed subdivision is suitable for the existing home and supports future residential development. <br /> 4. The proposed subdivision makes adequate provision for water supply, storm drainage, seavage transportation, erosion control <br /> and all other services,facilities and improvements otherwise required in this article. <br /> The proposed subdivision has adequate provision for all required facilities. <br /> 5. The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage. <br /> The proposed subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage. <br /> 6. The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of a court. <br /> The proposed subdivision will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by <br /> judgment of a court. The existing easements on the city owned lot will remain in place, and will not interfere <br /> with future development proposals. <br /> 7. The proposed subdivision will not have an undue and adverse impact on the reasonable development of neighboring land. <br /> The proposed subdivision will not have an undue impact on future development in the area as it is setting up <br /> future development opportunities consistent with adjacent land uses. <br /> 8. The proposed subdivision is notpremature.A subdivision 1.spremature if any of the following exists: <br /> a. Lack of adequate stormwater drainage. <br /> b. Lack of adequate roads. <br /> c. Lack of adequate sanitary sewer systems. <br /> d. Lack of adequate off-site public improvements or support systems. <br /> N:\Public Bodies\Agenda Packets\04-15-2019\Final\7.2 sr Ondracek Addition.docx <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.