Laserfiche WebLink
MN Statute 469.174 Subd. 10. Definition of a Redevelopment district. <br />"Redevelopment district" means a type of tax increment financing district consisting of a project, or portions of a <br />project, within which the authority finds by resolution that one or more of the following conditions, reasonably <br />distributed throughout the district, exists: <br />(1) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or <br />gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, <br />are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; <br />(2) the property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used rail yards, rail <br />storage facilities, or excessive or vacated railroad rights-of-way; <br />(3) tank facilities, or property whose immediately previous use was for tank facilities, as defined in section 115C.02, <br />subdivision 15, if the tank facilities: <br />(i) have or had a capacity of more than 1,000,000 gallons; <br />(ii) are located adjacent to rail facilities; and <br />(iii) have been removed or are unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used; or <br />(4) a qualifying disaster area, as defined in subdivision 10b. <br />For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a <br />combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate <br />egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total <br />significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. <br />A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or <br />could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new <br />structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified <br />as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the <br />size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs, or other similar <br />reliable evidence. The municipality may not make such a determination without an interior inspection of the property, <br />but need not have an independent, expert appraisal prepared of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building. <br />An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality finds that (1) the municipality or authority is <br />unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or <br />controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is <br />structurally substandard. Items of evidence that support such a conclusion include recent fire or police inspections, <br />on-site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable