Laserfiche WebLink
11111.11/8 <br /> ffirtrirlsoatt <br /> installation of small-cell telecommunications and the publicly-owned utilities serving <br /> equipment. This order took effect January 14, municipalities must have the authority to account <br /> 2019. The order is under legal challenge, a move for the safety and health of their communities <br /> supported by MMUA and APPA, but the legal as well as authority over technical and aesthetic <br /> issues could more efficiently and cost-effectively considerations. They must also be able to impose <br /> be dealt with by congressional action vacating the fees that fully cover the costs associated with <br /> order and restoring local control. processing small cell installation applications and <br /> enforcing related local ordinances and regulations <br /> The new FCC regulations prescribe what small applicable to small-cell providers. This is the only <br /> cell antennae equipment cities must allow in their way to fully ensure that the public not be forced to <br /> ROWs and on their infrastructure, such as utility subsidize the protected private use of the public's <br /> poles. These regulations include tight timelines assets. <br /> for processing applications, and fee limits that, if <br /> exceeded, are presumed to be excessive and thus an Without Congressional action to undo the FCC's <br /> unlawful barrier to access. order, MMUA and its member utilities will be <br /> forced to continue seeking relief from the courts. <br /> The Minnesota Legislature debated this issue in Litigation is far more costly than reasonable <br /> 2017. Legislation was developed that would have legislation to restore long protected local control <br /> preempted local control on a number of issues efforts. To minimize costs, MMUA is currently <br /> related to the expansion of 5G service and"small working with three other states to identify the <br /> cell"wireless, but in the end the Legislature best way to support and participate in current and <br /> exempted municipal utilities from the new possible future legal challenges to the FCC's order, <br /> regulations. but even shared efforts are expensive. <br /> The basis for the FCC's approach appears to be a MMUA Position <br /> new perspective that simply disregards the benefits MMUA urges Congress to pass legislation in line <br /> of local accountability, combined with a suggestion with Rep. Eshoo's HR 530 which would overturn <br /> that local governments may be creating a "barrier the FCC's jurisdictional overreach and restore local <br /> to service providers" seeking to establish their more control over public rights-of-way, utility poles and <br /> profitable 5G networks via the use of small-cell attachments, and the fees which can be charged for <br /> equipment. providing access to them. Finally, Congress needs <br /> to oppose efforts to bypass previously provided <br /> When establishing appropriate regulations and congressional exemption from most FCC oversight <br /> fees regarding pole attachments and public of municipal utilities' control of their ROWs and <br /> rights-of-way under their care, local governments infrastructure. <br /> Safety and aesthetics are <br /> legitimate local government <br /> concerns. Pole attachments <br /> can be particularly <br /> troublesome in cities <br /> tt 114 <br /> ' _ where much of the utility <br /> T, infrastructure has already <br /> been placed underground. <br /> "41" � :1 Pictured here is Barnesville. <br /> �.�. "7s �''""'A <br /> • <br /> 2019 Federal Position Statements/7 <br /> 133 <br />