Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />October 26, 2004 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if Tractor Supply could locate their facility on the <br />commercial lot as it is now. Ms. McPherson stated yes, it could physically accommodate the <br />business, but that Tractor Supply has indicated to her that they would not be able to locate <br />their typical prototype on the lot. Commissioner Anderson stated that he concurred with <br />Commissioner Stevens and was not in favor of approval of the requests. He stated that he <br />would like to see Maxsun locate a store in Elk River on another location. <br /> <br />Commissioner Westgaard asked if the easement portion of Lot 1, Block 3 was unbuildable. <br />Ms. McPherson stated that the easement area could be added to the Maxsun Furniture site as <br />green space. Commissioner Westgaard stated that he would like to see how the driveways to <br />these sites line up with Home Depot. Mr. Maurer stated that if the requests are approved, <br />these issues would be looked at as part of the conditional use permit for each individual site. <br />He explained that the access could be accomplished by cross access agreements between <br />Maxsun Furniture and Tractor Supply. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevens stated that he felt approval of the interim uses in the past in this area <br />allowed the" camel's nose in the tent" so to speak, and now they are faced with a request for <br />more commercial development of land set aside for business park. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that the Planning Commission voted unanimously against <br />the interim uses for the Business Park, but that the City Council decided to allow them. He <br />stated that he felt they need to be consistent and follow the Comprehensive Plan. He stated <br />that he could foresee expansion of the commercial uses continuing southward and slowly <br />eroding away the land set aside for light industrial use. He stated that even though the land <br />is attractive to commercial users because it is sitting there ready to go, he felt the City needs <br />to wait and the right industrial user will eventually come. <br /> <br />MOTION BY COMMISSIONER STEVENS AND SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER ANDERSON TO RECOMMEND DENIAL OF THE <br />REQUEST BY FISCHER SAND & AGGREGATE, LLC/ ASSOCIATED <br />INVESTORS OF ELK RIVER, INC. TO AMEND THE LAND USE FROM LI <br />LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO HB HIGHWAY BUSINESS. MOTION FAILED 3-4. <br />Chair Ropp and Commissioners Lemke, Offerman and Westgaard opposed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lemke stated that he did not recall that the vote on the interim uses for the <br />Business Park were unanimous. He stated that it was his understanding that the <br />Commission voted to approve the Comprehensive Plan because of the fact that it was a <br />guiding document. He did not feel this request was unreasonable and that it fit the general <br />plan for the area. <br /> <br />MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEMKE AND SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER OFFERMAN TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE <br />REQUEST BY FISHER SAND & AGGREGATE, LLC/ASSOCIATED <br />INVESTORS OF ELK RIVER, INC. TO AMEND THE LAND USE FROM <br />LI,LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO HB HIGHWAY BUSINESS, CASE NO. LU 04-04. <br />MOTION CARRIED 4-3. Commissioners Anderson, Stevens and Scott opposed. <br /> <br />MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LEMKE AND SECONDED BY <br />COMMISSIONER OFFERMAN TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE <br />REQUEST FOR REZONING FROM BP BUSINESS PARK TO PUD, PLANNED <br />