08-24-2004 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. . . Planning Commission Minutes August 24, 2004 Page 6 theme of all white houses, as shown in the example provided by staff. Ms. McPherson stated that the photographs were provided as an example of an architectural theme. Chair Ropp stated that the public hearing would be continued to the September 28, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Leeseberg asked for comments from the Commission regarding architectural themes. Discussion followed regarding what elements constitute a theme. Commissioner Offerman stated he did not want to design the project for the developer. Commissioner Curtis suggested looking at exterior finishes, as they do for townhomes. Commissioner Anderson did not feel it was appropriate to get that specific. He felt that a theme should have significant ties to the adjacent landscape or uses, or it could be unique in itself. Commissioner Offerman stated that the number of amenities and design standards contribute to a theme. Ms. McPherson stated that it appears the consensus of the Commission was that an architectural theme consists of a combination of elements and amenities. She felt that it is necessary for developers to illustrate a theme, as opposed to a written narrative. Commissioner Lemke asked what the City receives back when a density bonus is allowed. Ms. McPherson explained that when density bonuses are allowed, open space is permanently preserved and can be linked to other open spaces, which also provides wildlife connections. She stated that a trail should have been provided along 212m Avenue, but that they did not foresee the possibility of inter-connected trails between cluster developments. She felt that there was some merit in creating a larger loop trail and that some credit should be given for it. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER OFFERMAN TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE REQUEST BY 10-24 DEVELOPERS, LLC FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF WINDSOR MEADOWS, TO THE SEPTEMBER 28, 2004 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. MOTION CARRIED 6-0. 5.7. Request by City of Elk River for Ordinance Amendment to Land Use Regulations Regarding Signs - Section 30-866.30-991 (R1a District). 30-1562 (A1 District). and 30-1565 (AR District). Public Hearing - Case No. OA 04-02 Planner Chris Leeseberg stated that the Commission is asked to consider an Ordinance Amendment to the Land Use Regulations regarding signs. Mr. Leeseberg reviewed the details of the proposed language changes to the ordinance. Commissioner Anderson asked if Item 8 of the amendment affects non-residential uses or apartments. Ms. McPherson stated no. Chair Ropp opened the public hearing. There being no further public comment, Chair Ropp closed the public hearing. MOTION BY COMMISSIONER ANDERSON AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LEMKE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE REGULATIONS REGARDING SIGNS, CASE NO. OA 04-02, AS PRESENTED