My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-2004 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2000 - 2009
>
2004
>
06-22-2004 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:14 AM
Creation date
5/23/2005 9:24:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
6/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br />June 22, 2004 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />points. Ms. McPherson noted that an existing farmstead is located on a 7.27-acre lot located <br />in the southwest comer of the site. She explained that the developer would be required to <br />realign Tyler Street in order to create a 90-degree four-legged intersection. Ms. McPherson <br />stated that Tyler Street within the plat would provide subdivision opportunities for the <br />residential properties to the west. <br /> <br />Ms. McPherson reviewed the chart provided in the staff report, which illustrates the zoning <br />comparison of the Rid Single Family District requirements with the PUD District. <br /> <br />Ms. McPherson discussed transportation issues and recommendations by City Engineer <br />Terry Maurer including the extension of 188m Lane and its impact on park dedication, and <br />the splitting of Oudot A in order to prevent it becoming a "spite strip". She stated that <br />utilities, grading, and drainage issues are addressed in the City Engineer's memo attached to <br />the staff report. Ms. McPherson noted that Environmental Technician Rebecca Haug has <br />submitted a memo with conditions to address wedand impacts and the wedand mitigation <br />plan. She reviewed the Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation for park <br />dedication which includes the acquisition of Oudot I, cash dedication funds, and trails and <br />sidewalk extensions. Ms. McPherson reviewed the housing types and landscape plan. Staff <br />recommends approval of the requests by Ryan Development with the findings and <br />conditions listed in the staff report. <br /> <br />Chair Ropp asked how the lot sizes compare to those in Trott Brook Farms. Ms. <br />McPherson stated that the single family lots in Trott Brook Farms are larger. <br /> <br />Chair Ropp opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Dennis Griswold of Ryan Contracting, Inc., noted that the proposed development of this <br />site has gone from 250-plus units to 142 units. He discussed the housing types and buyer's <br />market for the proposed project. <br /> <br />Mr. Griswold provided the following the following comments regarding staff's <br />recommendations: <br /> <br />. The project could get "hung up" if they were required to acquire right-of-way from the <br />adjoining property owner, in order to realign the Tyler Street intersection. He suggested <br />that they could realign the intersection within the plat by removing a lot and adding one <br />on the east side of the plat. He felt that if the City wanted the realignment proposed by <br />the City Engineer, that the City could exercise their right of eminent domain to acquire <br />the right-of-way. <br />· They estimated that the cost of extending 188th Lane would be approximately $300,000, <br />with only 142 units to pay for it. Also, the additional property taken away from the park <br />dedication (1.4 acres) would cost them additional $20,000-$30,000 in value. If the City <br />feels there truly is a need for this connection, the City may consider allowing them to <br />utilize one-half of the wedand frontage to construct an additional six units to make up <br />the loss, and the remaining park land would still be a nice asset. <br />· The buffer of trees to the west would provide some protection for the neighboring <br />residences. <br />· If any of the neighboring property owners wished to develop their property, he felt it <br />was fair for them to pay for half the cost of extending the street. <br />· The required street widths are acceptable, but that there are a few lots where setbacks <br />will be tight, due to the wedands. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.