My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-25-2002 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2000 - 2009
>
2002
>
06-25-2002 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:12 AM
Creation date
5/23/2005 8:49:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
6/25/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />June 25, 2002 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Staff report by Scott Harlicker. Contour Excavating request preliminary plat approval of <br />Birchview, a six single family lot plat, located at 20737 Quincy Street at the 207th Avenue <br />alignment. Mr. Harlicker reviewed the location of wetlands, wooded areas, and the existing <br />home. He explained that the 700 foot maximum length for a cul de sac cannot be met due <br />to the wetland. Staff would recommend allowing the additional 140 foot length, if the plat is <br />approved, in order to avoid a significant amount of wetland filling. <br /> <br />Mr. Harlicker reviewed the layout of the streets and lots. Staff recommends that the lot line <br />between Lots 4 and 5 be adjusted to allow for extra width between the edge of the wetland <br />and the property line in order to accommodate a driveway on Lot 4. <br /> <br />Mr. Harlicker discussed the wetland issues associated with Lots 3 and 4. He noted that the <br />Planning Commission may recommend approval of a plat with one lot that does not comply <br />with the minimum lot size requirement. Also, he noted that even if the wetland is excluded <br />from the lot size of Lot 3, the remaining 1.7 acres is adequate to support the proposed <br />residence and the proposed primary and alternative septic system locations. Mr. Harlicker <br />stated that the Park and Recreation Commission has recommended cash to meet the park <br />dedication requirement. Two street trees per lot will be required, as well as a landscaping <br />plan showing location of trees. He noted that the Wetland Technical Evaluation Panel will <br />again review the plans. <br /> <br />Chair Mesich asked what type of wetland was behind Lot 6. Mr. Harlicker noted that the <br />wetland was a Type 2 and he explained where the Type 3 wetland portion was located. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker asked what the difference was between a Type 2 and a Type 3 wetland. <br />Mr. Harlicker stated that it was his understanding that a Type 3 wetland has standing water <br />throughout most of the year, and a Type 2 wetland is dry part of the year and has standing <br />water part of the year. Commissioner Baker asked if the lot lines could be adjusted so that <br />Lot 3 meets the minimum lot size. Mr. Harlicker explained that acreage is limited outside <br />the wetland and no matter how the property is divided up, one of the 6 lots would be <br />deficient. <br /> <br />Chair Pederson opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Marty Campion, Civil Engineer with Otto Associates, stated he was present <br />representing Coutour Excavating. He stated that he concurs with the comments in the staff <br />report. He stated that only approximately 1 acre of the 3.2-acre wetland in question is a <br />Type 3, and this classification is due to the deeper water within the wetland. He stated this <br />layout was The Technical Panel preferred this layout. A mitigation area to the north will be <br />reviewed by Kjolhaugh and the Technical Panel. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mesich asked for clarification on the driveway and septic location for Lot 6. <br />Mr. Campion explained the locations. Mr. Harlicker asked if the primary system will <br />encompass the entire area as shown. Mr. Campion stated that the area is 50'x100' which <br />would be twice what is needed for a conventional system, but would likely be close to the <br />actual size for a mound system. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Commissioner Franz asked if Lot 3 would become even smaller than 1.7 acres, if it were <br />used for wetland mitigation. Mr. Campion stated that the alternative location would be to <br />the east on Lot 4, which is heavily wooded. Also, wetlands could be mitigated next to the <br />existing wetland, but they would have to do a significant amount of grading for a small <br />amount of wetland. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.