Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />October 23,2001 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3. STREET LIGHTS BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED BY ELK RIVER <br />UTILITIES <br /> <br />4. A LETTER OF CREDIT BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY IN THE AMOUNT <br />OF 100% OF THE COSTS OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. <br /> <br />5. UPON COMPLETING ALL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AND HAVING <br />THEM ACCEPTED BY THE CITY, A WARRANTY BOND IN THE <br />AMOUNT OF 25% OF THE IMPROVEMENT COSTS SHALL BE <br />SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR THE PERIOD OF ONE YEAR. <br /> <br />6. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT FEE IN THE AMOUNT REQUIRED <br />BY THE CITY AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT BE PAID PRIOR TO <br />RELEASING THE PLAT FOR RECORDING. <br /> <br />7. A SEALCOAT FEE IN THE AMOUNT TO BE DETERMINED BY THE <br />CITY ENGINEER BE PAID PRIOR TO RELEASING THE PLAT FOR <br />RECORDING. <br /> <br />8. A GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN BE APPROVED BY THE <br />CITY ENGINEER <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />9. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE GRADED AND SEEDED. <br /> <br />10. ALL APPROPRIATE EASEMENTS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLAT. <br /> <br />11. ALL WELLS ON LOTS ABUTTING THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE <br />PLAT BE LOCATED TO THE EAST AS FAR AS POSSIBLE. <br /> <br />12. PARK DEDICATION FEES IN THE AMOUNT REQUIRED BY THE CITY <br />AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT BE PAID PRIOR TO RELEASING THE <br />PLAT FOR RECORDING. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER BAKER SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br />CARRIED 4-0. <br /> <br />5.6. <br /> <br />Request by the City of Elk River to Amend Business Park District Permitted and <br />Conditional Uses <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Director of Planning Michele McPherson reviewed the current Business Park District <br />standards and the proposed amendment to establish definitions for warehousing and <br />showrooms and to allow showroom space, repair! servicing of equipment, and increased <br />warehouse space. She stated that Mr. Rick Martens of Brookstone, Inc. has been involved in <br />the review process and he is present to offer his comments. Ms. McPherson reviewed each <br />of the proposed language changes and the basis for the changes. She noted that the <br />Economic Development Authority reviewed the proposed and existing language at their <br />October meeting. Staff feels that the proposed language is a balance between the needs of <br />the market and the needs of the City in their efforts to continue to encourage job creation <br />and businesses that provide opportunities for residents to work within the community. Staff <br />recommends approval of the proposed language. <br />