Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />July 24, 2001 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />lots based on the zoning district, plus an additional 3 lots for density bonuses for a total of <br />11 lots. Mr. Harlicker reviewed the density bonus detail, streets, lot sizes, open space <br />provisions, grading, drainage and utilities, landscaping and environmental issues. The Park <br />and Recreation Commission has recommended payment of park dedication fees in the form <br />of cash, and that the applicant provide a trail easement along 207th Avenue, across Outlot B <br />along the north boundary of the plat. Staff recommends approval of the plat with the 21 <br />conditions listed in the staff report. <br /> <br />Chair Pederson opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Steve Hickman, 20562 Victoria Drive, stated his concerns regarding oak wilt. He <br />explained that he trenched his lot when building his home in order to preserve trees and he <br />still lost trees. He felt that the lighting proposed for this development should be extended to <br />their existing development to provide continuity. He also expressed concern that the homes <br />built in this development would not be comparable to the homes in the existing <br />neighborhood. Mr. Hickman stated that his main concern was the developer's agreement <br />for Hilltop Woods Estates stating that any future phase of the development is subject to a <br />condition that not more lots can be developed without an additional access to County Road <br />32. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Jim Brown, representing Dynamics Design and Land Co., applicant, stated that he has <br />been working with the County Forester, Tim Edgeton, and that he has received a written <br />response from him which was forwarded to Mr. Harlicker, regarding oak wilt prevention He <br />stated that the home values proposed for this development will be upscale and "higher end" <br />pricing. He stated that he was not aware of any agreement requiring a through-street to be <br />built before development can occur. Mr. Brown stated that eventually through-streets will <br />occur as development continues and there would be 30 - 64 additional lots in this area. He <br />stated that he has contacted the County Ditch Inspector and he has no concerns. Drainage <br />calculations will be going to Mr. Maurer for his review. <br /> <br />Mark Malzahn, 20590 Victoria Drive, stated that the residents living in Hilltop Woods <br />Estates have relied on the information in the developer's agreement which was recorded <br />with their deeds, stating that no development can occur until Victoria Drive is extended to a <br />thru-street. He did not feel the proposed development would have any continuity with their <br />development, since their lots are 3 acres and homes are valued in excess of $200,000. He did <br />not feel the property was suitable for cluster development and did not feel a comparable <br />home could be built on the small lots being proposed. <br /> <br />Anthony Pestello, 20511 Victoria Drive, expressed his concern for safety without another <br />street outlet. He did not feel a cluster development was consistent with their existing <br />development. Mr. Pestello expressed his concern for possible tree loss. He stated that he <br />also trenched his property, spending thousands of dollars, and he still lost approximately <br />2,000 oaks. He felt that he had done a good job of saving trees and asked that the <br />Commission make sure all measures were taken to save trees in this proposed development. <br /> <br />Micke Juillerat, Lot 5, asked if the City ordinance does not allow a cul-de-sac to be more <br />than 700 feet, how could this development be approved. Mr. Maurer explained that it has <br />been City policy to allow "temporary" cul-de-sacs and require road connections be <br />established within the plat for future extension when adjacent properties develop. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Juillerat felt that the turn onto Victoria Drive off County Road 32 was too sharp, and <br />that this was a safety concern that should be taken into consideration. He noted that the <br />