My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-24-2001 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2000 - 2009
>
2001
>
07-24-2001 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:11 AM
Creation date
5/23/2005 8:29:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
7/24/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />July 24, 2001 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mesich asked what happened to the 2-3-4 story stepped design the developer <br />discussed at previous meetings. Mr. Sween stated that they are willing to look at that type of <br />design, but that for every foot which is removed from the height of the building, the <br />footprint will be increased by 20 feet. Mr. Sween felt that when the buildings are <br />constructed, they will appear less dense than any apartment buildings. He stated that there <br />will be the equivalent of 1 ~ football fields of open space between the buildings. He felt <br />these buildings will be superior in comparison to any apartment buildings the Commission <br />may have seen. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker asked if the existing trees would be preserved. Mr. Sween stated that <br />the trees are a valuable resource and that they rarely get an opportunity to build on a site <br />with large mature trees. He stated that they intend to make every effort to preserve the <br />existing trees, as well as planting additional trees. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed the roof line of the buildings with Mr. Sween. The <br />Commissioners were in agreement that that one building be done with the 3-4 story step <br />design as shown and one building with a 2-3-4 step design. <br /> <br />Mr. Sween stated that apartment units will range in size for 950 square feet for a smaller unit <br />to 1,400 for a 3-bedroom townhome-style unit. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The Commissioners discussed exterior materials and maintenance with Mr. Sween. Mr. <br />Sween stated that they plan to use a cement lap siding product on the exterior. He explained <br />that they are also concerned with maintenance of the buildings, since they are in the business <br />of long-term ownership <br /> <br />Mark Putman, Putman Planning & Design, reviewed the layout of the project, including <br />the parks and open space. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker questioned whether or not the project provided enough commercial <br />space to serve the needs of this many residents. Mr. Pratt stated that it is necessary to create <br />enough critical mass of housing to support the retail, and that the space will be set aside for <br />development, once the users (residents) are in place. <br /> <br />Commissioner Baker asked if enough sidewalks are included to serve the residents. Ms. <br />McPherson stated that there are so many sidewalks proposed, that staff has actually asked <br />them to remove some of them. <br /> <br />Commissioner Franz asked what type of lighting is proposed. Mr. Pratt stated that they will <br />chose some type of soft lighting based on aesthetic appeal. Ms. McPherson noted that the <br />developers will be working with Connexus and that the utilities generally allow the <br />developers to chose their own style of lighting. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER MESICH MOVED TO TABLE THE REQUESTS BY ELK <br />RIVER STATION LLP TO THE AUGUST 14,2001 PLANNING COMMISSION <br />SPECIAL MEETING AND WORKSHOP. COMMISSIONER FRANZ <br />SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 6-0. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />5.12. Request by City of Elk River for Ordinance Amendment. Section 900 to Revise Business <br />Park Zoning District Building Designs and Materials Standards. Public Hearing - Case No. <br />OA 01-08 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.