My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-27-2001 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2000 - 2009
>
2001
>
02-27-2001 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:11 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 3:22:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
2/27/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />February 27,2001 <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Mesich asked if the City Engineer did not feel the entire site should <br />be commercial. Terry Maurer, City Engineer, stated that he felt this layout best <br />serves the site. <br /> <br />Scott Powell, applicant, stated that he did not want to impact his neighbors to <br />the south. He felt the cul-de-sac lends well to a restaurant location. <br /> <br />Chair Mesich asked if Mr. Powell had elevations for the townhomes available. Mr. <br />Powell stated that elevations were not yet available. <br /> <br />It was the consensus of the Commissioners that a condition #21 be added to <br />require a conditional use permit for review of the town home portion of the <br />project. <br /> <br />Discussion followed regarding the issue of the road connection at the Hanlon <br />Monument site. Commissioner Mesich asked if the south property (Hanlon <br />Monument) was not acquired, how long the cul-de-sac would be. Terry Maurer <br />estimated that it would be approximately 1,000 feet. City Attorney Peter Beck <br />suggested that the Commission could recommend approval with a condition <br />that the road connection issue be resolved. Mr. Powell stated that he has made <br />numerous attempts to negotiate a land exchange with the property owner and <br />has not been successful. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pederson stated he was in favor of tabling the request until the <br />issues were resolved. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Chair Mesich stated that he felt it was a good project, and that MN/DOT would <br />eventually close the access anyway. <br /> <br />Steve Rohlf spoke in response to Mr. Kirkeide's environmental issues, as outlined in <br />his letter. Mr. Rohlf specifically addressed the issue of whether or not the City <br />moving the Wild & Scenic River Boundary constituted a rule change. Mr. Rohlf <br />said the boundary move was an interpretation of the rules, not a change to <br />them. <br /> <br />Chair Mesich stated he did not see a reason to table the requests. <br />Commissioners Schuster and Pederson agreed. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER PEDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST <br />BY scon POWELL FOR A LAND USE AMENDMENT FROM HB (HIGHWAY BUSINESS) TO <br />MR (MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL) CASE NO. LU 01-03. COMMISSIONER BAKER <br />SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 7-0. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER PEDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST <br />BY scon POWELL FOR A REZONING FROM C3 (HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL) TO PUD <br />(PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT), CASE NO. ZC 01-04, WITH THE FOLLOWING <br />FINDINGS OF FACT: <br /> <br />1. THAT THE REZONING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />AND ZONING ORDINANCE. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. THAT THE REZONING WILL NOT CREATE ADVERSE IMPACTS TO ADJACENT USES. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.