Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />December 12. 2000 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Rich Hardy, 19383 Dodge Street NW, was opposed to having residential homes <br />backed up to Menards. He asked whet happened to the idea of relocating the <br />park to this site. <br /> <br />Cheri Leonard, 19334 Dodge Street, stated that she was told by the developer <br />that she had the right to give her house back if the developer didn't follow <br />through on his promises. Chair Mesich stated that that would be a legal matter <br />she would need to pursue through an attorney. He stated that the street lights <br />and retaining walls are issues which can be addressed by the City. Ms. Leonard <br />stated that she does not oppose the commercial area. but she objects to the <br />traffic which will be created because of this development and feels the residents <br />have a right to have a safe neighborhood. Ms. Leonard asked how she could <br />get a response from the City if her Council member was not willing. Chair Mesich <br />stated that she was welcome to attend a City Council meeting for the Open <br />Mike portion to express her concerns. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Scott Fitzgerald, 19374 Dodge Street NW, stated that he and the neighbors which <br />are present are trying to create a good community. He asked what revenues will <br />be generated in park dedication from this plat. He also asked if credit would be <br />given to the developer for the power line corridor. Steve Wensman, Planner, <br />stated that the developer will be given credit for the 4.7 acres of park, minus the <br />wetlands, and that no credit will be given for the power line corridor. Mr. <br />Fitzgerald asked how much cash will be given to the City? Michele McPherson, <br />Director of Planning, explained that the City's park dedication ordinance states <br />that the City may require 10 percent of the land for park dedication, which would <br />be 6.7 acres if only land was dedicated, or cash could be required in lieu of land, <br />or a combination of land and cash. Park dedication fees go into a fund for <br />acquiring park land or providing park amenities. The park dedication fees are <br />based on the fair market value of the raw land. This amount is usually determined <br />through the developer agreement process. Ms. McPherson stated that the Park <br />& Recreation Commission has recommended a combination of park land and <br />cash and that an estimate of this value could be available for the City Council <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Ellen Fredericks, 19381 Baldwin Circle NW, stated that two of the street lights at <br />the 193rd and Evans intersection have never worked. She suggested lighting up <br />the intersection and adding lighted or larger signage to warn west-bound traffic <br />on 193rd that oncoming traffic does not stop. Ms. McPherson stated that she will <br />bring the lighting issue to the attention of the Utilities General Manager, Bryan <br />Adams. <br /> <br />John Corkery, 19424 Baldwin Circle NW, suggested that since new schools will be <br />built, additional property could acquired to add onto the school property for <br />parks. He stated that the City needs to look for ways to save money when <br />planning parks so that its residents can afford to stay here. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Cheri Leonard, 19334 Dodge Street, asked if the Planning Commission can deny <br />the plan. Commissioner Chambers stated that they can either recommend <br />denial or approval and it will still go on to the City Council for review. <br />Commissioner Kuester noted that the Planning Commission cannot simply deny <br />the plan because they don't like it; they need to establish findings based on the <br />