09-26-2000 PC MIN - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Minutes September 26. 2000 Page 11 . private area. She further explained that the trail easement to the south was requested for possible use in the future. Since the City does not know the future of the gun club property, no trail would be built at this time. Commissioner Baker asked if a density bonus has been granted in the past for preserving a structure or architectural theme. Ms. McPherson stated that a density bonus was allowed in Rolling Hills for preserving a barn. Mr. Johnston stated that the development will have a defined architectural theme which will include front porches and stoops, side-load garages and garages set back into the back of the lot, wherever it is possible. He displayed photographs of homes in other developments they have done which reflected this type of style. Mr. Johnston described details of the proposed gazebo which ties into the architectural theme. He noted that restrictive covenants will ensure that quality exterior materials will be used including wood siding, brick, stucco and a high grade vinyl siding. Chair Chambers opened the public hearing. . Deb Meyers, 20927 Elk lake Road, a resident living across from the proposed development, expressed her concern regarding safety issues associated with the gun club, impact on the schools, traffic, the bike path and the community septic system. Ms. Meyers stated that with 40 homes, there is a potential for 80 children in the development. She explained her concern for safety since the fence around the gun club is only about 4 feet high and can easily be climbed by a child. Also, the number of children which will be added to the schools by this development will require four additional classrooms. Ms. Meyers was concerned that the bike path would interfere with their horseback riding. Possible odor and leaching from the community septic system was also a concern, as well as the additional traffic which would be generated on County Road 1. George Zabee, representing the Elk River Gun Club, explained that the gun club has been in existence since 1964 and is a community-minded organization. He stated that the club provides safety training for young people including scouting and 4-H groups. Mr. Zabee explained that the club has 300 acres of property and fencing of the entire perimeter of the property was recently completed. He stated that the club is not opposed to the cluster development but that they have several concerns. He stated that one concern has been addressed which was the need for a buffer. He felt that by leaving the trees on the knoll referred to by the developer, a natural buffer would be created which would help with noise, also. Mr. Zabee's second concern was that prospective buyers be made aware that there is a gun range adjacent to the development. He asked that the Planning Commission require the developer to print this information in their literature which is distributed to buyers. Mr. Zabee also requested that the developer be required to install a chain link fence around the northeastern corner of the gun club. He concluded by stating it is true that the DNR was interested in the gun club property, but that the gun club is not interested in the DNR. . Katie T. of 13269 211th Avenue NW, asked why there will be an access onto 21lfh and if it would be paved. Mr. Harlicker stated that a second access is required to emergency purposes and there are no plans to pave it at this time.