My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-27-1998 PC MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
1990 - 1999
>
1998
>
10-27-1998 PC MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:09 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 1:54:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PCM
date
10/27/1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />October 27, 1998 <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Chair Mesich felt the right-in-right-out would create a dangerous situation. Mr. <br />Frank indicated that without the access, development of Lot 1 would be <br />extremely difficult. Mr. Frank added that he will pursue the access issue with the <br />County. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kuester asked Mr. Frank to review the approximate location of <br />signage for the project. She questioned whether or not the traffic to the loading <br />areas would be using the right-in-right-out access. Mr. Frank explained indicated <br />the access pattern to the loading docks. Mr. Gleekel indicated a free-standing <br />pylon sign is proposed to be located in the proximity of Lot 1 off Highway 169. Mr. <br />Gleekel indicated the signage will be discussed in detail with staff in order to <br />comply with the city's ordinances. Scott Harlicker indicated the signage would <br />be similar to Elk Park Center. <br /> <br />Commissioner Chambers questioned whether or not an architectural style has <br />been determined for the project. Mr. Gleekel indicated it is their intent to work <br />with the city and their future tenants regarding the facade of the buildings within <br />the project, signage and landscaping. <br /> <br />Peter Beck explained the PUD agreement will include detailed site plans, <br />landscape plans, and building elevations which will be reviewed the Planning <br />Commission and City Council. In addition, the PUD agreement will provide for <br />review of the free-standing sites on an individual basis through the conditional use <br />process. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Chambers indicated that since this intersection is a major link with <br />the downtown, he felt it is a appropriate to have an architectural theme to make <br />that connection. Commissioner Cote expressed his agreement. <br /> <br />Chair Mesich questioned if the individual tenants were named in the PUD process <br />for Elk Park Center. Peter Beck indicated the elevations and sign bands were <br />included for the anchor tenants but not the names. Individual pads were <br />identified for banks, restaurants, etc. and the overall look of the project was <br />established in planning process. Chair Mesich questioned if colors and building <br />facades were approved at that time. Peter Beck indicated he did not recall that <br />those types of items were approved in the conditional use permit for the initial <br />project, but that the city has the authority to go to that level of review. <br /> <br />Commissioner Schuster questioned why a two-way access was not requested. <br />Mr. Frank indicated a two-way access would not be approved and a right-in- <br />right-out was the most they could hope for. <br /> <br />Chair Mesich questioned if the Park and Recreation Commission would be <br />reviewing the project for their recommendation. Scott Harlicker indicated the <br />project would be considered at their November meeting. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cote asked if screening is proposed for the back of the anchor <br />tenant buildings. Mr. Frank felt the spatial separation created by the pond and <br />the 25 foot grade would provide adequate screening and separation. Scott <br />noted evergreens are shown to be planted on the west side of the wetlands <br />adjacent to the buildings. Scott questioned whether or not recessed loading <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.