My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.1.D. ERMUSR 11-15-2011
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Utilities Commission
>
Packets
>
2003-2013
>
2011
>
11-15-2011
>
3.1.D. ERMUSR 11-15-2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2019 12:53:36 PM
Creation date
2/1/2019 12:53:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
ERMUSR
date
11/15/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Canterbury, Michelle <br />From: Porath, Katie <br />Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 9:02 AM <br />To: Canterbury, Michelle; Mauren, Tony <br />Subject: RE: Items from 2012 Utilities Commission packets <br />Thank you. Here is the info for 2011 I b 1-u..-ke� <br />01-11-2011 <br />3.1d-Designate First National Bank of Elk River as official depository for 2010, 3.1e <br />Designate Elk River Star News as official newspaper for 2010 Q <br />02-15-2011 <br />5.1 b P: <br />03-08-2011 <br />3.1a Check Register, -r <br />04-12-2011 <br />3 a <br />05-10-2011 <br />3, <br />06-14-2011 <br />3. <br />07-12-2011 <br />08-09-2011 <br />09-13-2011 <br />10-11-2011 <br />11-15-2011 <br />1 C1 "-w6i <br />12-13-2011 <br />Katie Porath <br />City of Elk River — Records Specialist <br />13065 Orono Parkway, Elk River, MN 55330 <br />763.635.1006 ElkltiverMN.eov <br />From: Canterbury, Michelle <br />Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 8:50 AM <br />To: Porath, Katie; Mauren, Tony <br />Subject: RE: Items from 2012 Utilities Commission packets <br />Good morning Katie, <br />Thanks for the update on the 2012 utilities commission packets and what you are missing. I just double checked my <br />January 2012 packet, and there was no memo or documentation for agenda item 3.4 or 3.5. I'm assuming they were <br />verbal which is kind of out of the ordinary on a consent agenda item. Also when I checked the meeting minutes for that <br />meeting it states that they approved the consent agenda items: a. December check register; b. December 11, <br />2011regular meeting minutes; and c. financial reports. So they were possibly presented verbally, and just got missed in <br />the minutes. Regardless, there is nothing that can be done now, and I think things need to be left as they are as the <br />agenda was approved as presented which included those two items: the bank designee and newspaper designee. <br />I am going to dig into 2011, next. If you find that you are missing something, it may work best if you let me know one <br />year at a time, so that either Tony or I can look them up as we go. <br />Thanks again for helping audit the utilities packets. O <br />Michelle Canterbury I Executive Administrative Manager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.