My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4.9. SR 02-04-2019
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2011 - 2020
>
2019
>
02-04-2019
>
4.9. SR 02-04-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2021 11:56:20 AM
Creation date
2/1/2019 8:22:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
2/4/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
345
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
departments? What is that plan exactly, because what they've written here isn't legally binding. <br />My guess is their plan is to do nothing, absolutely nothing. <br />Once again, I ask, has the Elk River Police department and Fire department been <br />contacted about any of this? <br />ADMISSION CRITERIA <br />#6 — individual needs a "restrictive setting" and is at risk of significant functional deterioration <br />if intensive residential treatment services are not received. <br />This isn't a "restrictive setting" that ResCare is proposing, By their own words patients are <br />allowed to come and go and be treated like adults. These two statements are contradictory. <br />OTHER DIAGNOSTIC CATEGORIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS <br />#1 — We will take clients who have a secondary diagnosis of chemical dependency. <br />In the public hearing ResCare went out of their way to state that this wasn't a "treatment <br />facility" but chemical dependency is a concern with these patients, if they go off of their meds <br />and self -medicate these people can be dangerous. <br />#4 —just to reiterate - We may take a level 1 or 2 sex offender. <br />They clearly lied or were not informed of their own policy during the public hearing, we <br />WILL NOT ACCEPT THIS AND WILL FEEL UNSAFE IN OUR <br />NEIGHBORHOOD. <br />CLIENTS WITH FELONIES AND GROSS MISDEMEANORS <br />ResCare response — It would be impossible to say we will never take a person with a Felony or <br />Gross Misdemeanor. It is safe to say we will from time to time take a client who has a Felony <br />of Gross Misdemeanor. <br />This speaks for itself - we WILL NOT ACCEPT THIS AND WILL FEEL UNSAFE <br />IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. <br />ResCare ended their statement with this: <br />"We will not take clients who are classified as Mentally Ill and Dangerous." <br />They cannot guarantee this. Their clients are suffering from Severe and Persistent Mental <br />Health Issues (SPMI). This is a very unpredictable population of people to introduce into a <br />single family neighborhood. <br />If you vote YES, we will be allowing the below into a vulnerable neighborhood, can we <br />afford as a city to take this risk. What is my family's and my neighbors safety worth to <br />the council? <br />Severe and Persistent Mental Illnesses <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.