My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-14-2002 PR MIN
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
P&R Minutes
>
2000 - 2019
>
2002
>
08-14-2002 PR MIN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2008 8:35:07 AM
Creation date
5/20/2005 9:36:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
PRM
date
8/14/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Park & Recreation Commission Minutes <br />August 14,2002 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />be $49,280.00. The Commission analyzed the park needs for this sub-area of the City as this <br />area is not identified in the Park Master Plan. The City's Meadowvale Park is located east of <br />the subject property. The Commission reviewed the following three options prior to making <br />a recommendation for park dedication: <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />accept no public land from this subdivision and request cash for approximately 30 <br />lots and wait for the westerly parcel to develop and accept up to 17 acres from that <br />subdivision; <br />accept the proposed park but relocate it in an area that has more flat open space that <br />requires less tree removal; <br />accept no land from this proposal or the adjacent proposal; instead accept cash for <br />the additional development of Meadowvale Heights Park or other City parks. <br /> <br />(2) <br />(3) <br /> <br />Staff requested that the Commission provide them with direction regarding park dedication <br />for not only this subdivision, but also for this portion of the City. Mr. Jim Brown of <br />Dynamics was in attendance to answer any questions that the Commission had. <br /> <br />Discussion took place on whether or not the Commission wanted to accept land or cash <br />dedication. Issues arose as to the topography and the quality of the parkland being offered, <br />public access to open space, trails, and development costs. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER SLADEK MOVED TO ACCEPT CASH DEDICATION, A 30- <br />FOOT TRAIL EASEMENT ALONG THE RAILROAD GRADE, AND PUBUC <br />ACCESS TO OPEN SPACE IN THE DEVELOPMENT. COMMISSIONER <br />NYSTROM SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 5-2. <br />COMMISSIONER KUESTER AND BRIGGS VOTED AGAINST. <br /> <br />9.B.3. <br /> <br />Elk River Station. Revised <br /> <br />Ms. McPherson asked the Commission to review a revised plan of Elk River Station and <br />discuss park dedication. The original plan for Elk River Station included approximately 480 <br />dwelling units, office space, and commercial uses on 65 acres of property. There were also a <br />variety of small open spaces that were to be used for green space and recreational areas. The <br />concept behind Elk River Station was to promote transit-oriented development in response <br />to the Northstar Corridor commuter parking lot and the future commuter rail. The <br />residential units were comprised of four 60-unit apartment buildings and back-to-back and <br />row townhomes. <br /> <br />The original concept has been changed to reduce the amount of vehicle trips per day out of <br />the site and so the number of apartment buildings has been reduced to one and additional <br />townhomes have been added. The total number of residential units currently stands at <br />approximately 290. <br /> <br />Ed Hasek, Westwood Development, stated that the total area of land for the residential <br />portion Elk River Station is approximately 50 acres with approximately 6.8 acres designated <br />as open space. He stated that these 6.8 acres would include a storm pond, a fountain pond, <br />an overlook and other open spaces for passive play. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Discussion took place on why there was no playground equipment proposed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.