Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Park & Recreation Commission Minutes <br />June 14, 2000 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />9.A.2. Letter from Jim Nystrom - Reaional Park Plannin9 <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER DANA ANDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY <br />COUNCIL CONSIDER THE PROPOSAL BY JIM NYSTROM FOR A COALITION FOR <br />REGIONAL PARK PLANNING ALONG THE HIGHWAY 101 AND 169 CORRIDORS. <br />COMMISSIONER REITSMA SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION CARRIED 8-0. <br /> <br />9.8.1. Joint Powers Aareement with ISD #728 <br /> <br />Michele McPherson explained that staff met with Dr. Flannery, Superintendent of <br />ISD #728, and Rick Foster and Daryl Thompson of Riverside Development to <br />discuss a possible joint powers agreement. The agreement proposes that the <br />School District purchase 20 acres of land from Riverside to locate an elementary <br />school. 16 acres of land would be dedicated for park purposes as a pre- <br />development dedication for the remaining 240 acres to be developed by <br />Riverside. The City would then own land which would be utilized by the School <br />and the City as recreation fields. Ms. McPherson stated that staff has informed <br />the developer that the 16 acres of pre-development land dedication would not <br />be considered full dedication, and once development of the 240 acres is <br />proposed, the City would look for additional land or fees to be paid to complete <br />the 10 percent requirement. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Commissioner Peterson asked why it would be called a joint powers agreement. <br />Ms. McPherson explained that the City would need to agree to accept the land <br />dedication, the City would own then own the land which would be used by the <br />School District, and the School District would agree to help pay for the <br />development of the fields. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dana Anderson questioned if the land met the City's criteria for <br />park dedication. He stated that he was in favor of the school district spreading its <br />resources by utilizing city park land, but he felt the City should enter into any <br />agreement with caution. He did not feel it was appropriate to accept park land <br />which included roadway and swamp and felt this should be deducted from the <br />acreage. <br /> <br />The Commissioners expressed concern with the term "joint powers agreement" <br />and felt "partnership" would be more appropriate. They also felt that more <br />details on the issue are needed. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER REITSMA MOVED TO RECOMMEND STAFF PROCEED WITH <br />NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT <br />REGARDING LOCATION OF AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ON 181sT AVENUE; AND THAT <br />ONLY DEVELOPABLE ACREAGE BE CREDITED TOWARD PARK DEDICATION <br />REQUIREMENTS. COMMISSIONER HUBERTY SECONDED THE MOTION. THE MOTION <br />FAILED 2-6. Commissioners Dave Anderson, Sladek, Peterson, Westrum and Dana <br />Anderson opposed. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />COMMISSIONER DANA ANDERSON MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT STAFF PROCEED <br />WITH NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND RIVERSIDE DEVELOPMENT, TO <br />CONSIDER A PARK DEDICATION OF TEN PERCENT FOR THE 36 ACRES AT THIS TIME, <br />LEAVING THE OPTION FOR THE DEVELOPER TO DEDICATE 16 ACRES IF HE CHOOSES. <br />