My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7.5 SR 12-18-1995
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
City Council
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
1993 - 1999
>
1995
>
12-18-1995
>
7.5 SR 12-18-1995
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 11:18:37 AM
Creation date
12/13/2018 11:15:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
CCM
date
12/18/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Recommendation <br />It is recommended the Planning Commission recommend approval of the .15 <br />acre variance request to the minimum lot size of one acre in the commercial <br />C3 zoning district for the Elk River Auto Mall LLC based on the following <br />findings: <br />1. That the special conditions and circumstances which exist are peculiar <br />to the auto mall development and that it is a unified development <br />with common parking and driveways that for all practical purposes <br />will function as one development. <br />2. The literal application of the minimum lot size requirements found in <br />the zoning ordinance would deprive the petitioner of rights enjoyed by <br />other similar commercial developments as well as multi -tenant office <br />developments with similar circumstances. <br />The variance would not have any adverse affect on the health, safety, <br />or the welfare of the residents or neighboring properties within the <br />area and will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the lot size <br />standards found within the zoning ordinance. <br />4. Literal enforcement of the zoning ordinance would prevent the division <br />of the subject property to create a separate parcel merely for <br />transferring of ownership. <br />5. Granting the variance would not allow any further development of the <br />existing auto mall and would therefore not grant any special <br />privileges upon the applicant to deviate from the city zoning ordinance <br />in any other way. <br />s:\p1anning\pc\v95-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.