My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3.1. EDA MINUTES (2 SETS) 12-17-2018
ElkRiver
>
City Government
>
Boards and Commissions
>
Economic Development Authority
>
EDA Packets
>
2014-2020
>
2018
>
12-17-2018
>
3.1. EDA MINUTES (2 SETS) 12-17-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 9:09:52 AM
Creation date
12/12/2018 11:37:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Government
type
EDSR
date
12/17/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Economic Development Authority Minutes Page 4 <br />October 15, 2018 <br />----------------------------- <br />President Tveite said it was bigger than the gravel mine area, there are other large <br />pieces of property. The EDA should work to determine what they are currently <br />zoned for, what their limitations are, and how to make them viable for development. <br />The city should begin to look at how to run urban services to these areas since this is <br />an issue that will come up when development is starting to occur. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blesener agreed the city and the developer will have to pay for urban <br />services. The city should begin an analysis of the ease urban services can be added to <br />certain undeveloped areas. <br /> <br />Ms. Othoudt indicated that the Gravel Mining Plan, approved in 2015 identified <br />utility connections in that specific area. <br /> <br />President Tveite said the goals for Year 3 look like they may need to be more <br />freeform than structured. There should be a planning exercise including pinpointing <br />what areas are currently zoned for and what areas would be zoned for if urban <br />services went there. There should be a “what if” analysis on some of the available or <br />soon to be available parcels. <br /> <br />Commissioner Westgaard said the goal should start with an internal assessment of <br />what is realistic. Would it be easier to extend services to the east or to the north? <br /> <br />Ms. Othoudt said an internal assessment could be conducted and the results brought <br />back to the committee including wastewater, Elk River Municipal Utilities, and <br />Engineering in the discussion. <br /> <br />Commissioner Westgaard discussed the current development of the Leachate pipe <br />up the Woodlands Trail area. <br /> <br />Ms. Othoudt asked the commission to examine their goals for Year 5. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wagner asked questions about the Leachate line and water lines. <br />Would it make sense to run this line along Highway 169 as part of the develop <br />process. <br /> <br />Commissioner Westgaard said a major expense would be adding a lift station. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blesener said the Leachate line is totally committed to the landfill and <br />it would be expensive to run sanitary sewer from any type of development. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blesener said that many of the Year 5 goals were related to what <br />happens in Year 3. <br /> <br />Commissioner Westgaard suggested reviewing preliminary concepts for the Highway <br />169 Redefine project that the state produces and further defining the goals after <br />seeing the initial concepts. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.