Laserfiche WebLink
Steering Committee Meeting Minutes <br />March 23, 1995 <br />Page 10 <br />Discussion followed regarding the Leroy Brown property and their desire to leave <br />the property out of the urban service. Chris Kreger explained his reasons for <br />including it in the ultimate urban service district. <br />Hank Duitsman stated that sewer and water will not be petitioned by residents <br />but rather, by developers, unless there is some type of ground water pollution <br />problem. He added that the drive for sewer and water on Highway 10 is <br />because of the desire for industrial development in the City. <br />Mark Lucas questioned what the costs would be for extending the services. Terry <br />Maurer stated that the costs and the actual assessments amounts may be <br />different. <br />Steve Rohlf pointed out the Areas 5, 6, 7 and 8 are already in the current urban <br />service district. He stated that he felt that Area 8 was included on this map for <br />discussion as to whether or not it should stay in the urban service district. Mr. <br />Reistma stated that Area 8 was not included in the 1988 Comprehensive Plan <br />but was added in 1990. <br />Chris Kreger stated that if his motion passes, Area 8 would be included <br />indefinitely, but that if it fails, Area 8 would still be included and a separate <br />motion would need to be made if it is to be taken out. <br />Merry Sipe stated that she opposes the plan because it was not her <br />understanding that the Committee decided on these two plans and that they <br />would be presented on plans for 5-10-15 year phasing. Chair Minton stated that <br />the previous motion was to call for more detail from staff on the two plans that <br />are now under discussion and that phasing was not included in the minutes. <br />Chair Minton stated that the motion before the Committee is to include Area 8, <br />and a line drawn down through the eastern border of 8 through 11. <br />THE MOTION FAILED 5-7. <br />5. Review Transportation Plan <br />Terry Maurer explained that the March 1993 transportation study was done to <br />identify and preserve transportation corridors that may be needed in the future. <br />Engineering staff modeled future development of the city, and based on the <br />zoning, the predicted. They attempted to estimate traffic routes to and from <br />industrial and commercial areas in the city, as well as commuter traffic through <br />the city. <br />They used current traffic counts from Wright, Anoka and Sherburne to project <br />future <br />What kind of corridors are needed so that it does have to go through the core <br />city. <br />Need to determine east -west corridor. One, route within City's corporate limits, <br />one option discussed with the Sherburne County Highway Department, one <br />