Laserfiche WebLink
Steering Committee Minutes ` 1rpa�e $ I �t 1�`j <br />August 25, 1994�'Uu gU L'V' U E <br />------------- <br />should be set aside now for industrial, rather than trying to put it next to homes <br />that are already there. <br />Committee Member Pat Dwyer noted that the City Council recently adopted a <br />business park zone in order to provide an area for light industrial development. <br />Marlon Glines stated that townships just outside of the Elk River area with 2'/2 acre <br />minimum lot sizes are developing at quite a fast pace. He questioned the <br />residents present whether or not they would be in favor of a lot size of two and <br />one-half acres if there were no adverse effects on the farmers. A majority of the <br />people were in favor of this concept. He stated that it has been his experience <br />that it is possible to have larger lots mixed with smaller lots when development <br />occurs. He stated that an older home can be remodeled to fit in with new <br />housing to look like it belongs there. Marly also explained how lots can be <br />subdivided with a sewer and water overlay, placing a home on the property in <br />such a way that it can be subdivided later if sewer and water is extended. <br />A resident asked that the Council take into consideration those residents like <br />himself who bought ten acres because that is what they wanted, and do not <br />want to see it changed. <br />Dick Hinkle explained that when he served on the Anoka Board of Realtors, the <br />Met Council tried to enforce a 10 acre minimum on local government and HUD <br />refused to finance anything less than 10 acres in that area. He stated that they <br />when to Washington D.C. to fight the restriction and won because it wasn't <br />legal. <br />Jerry Jackson, resident on 200th Avenue N.W., expressed his view that he receives <br />no benefits living in Elk River. <br />Committee Member Arne Engstrom stated that the County Board voted to open <br />development to two and one-half acre lots. This does not mean there cannot be <br />larger lots, only a minimum of two and one-half acres. <br />Cecilia Scheel agreed with Arne Engstrom that people want to be able to <br />develop their property if they wish. <br />Cindy Lowe, resident in Greenhead Acres, expressed her opinion that she would <br />like to see the lot size remain at 10 acres. She stated that she has a four acre lot <br />and does not want to receive a huge assessment at some point in the future for <br />improvements. <br />Chris Kreger stated that the closer a resident lives to the urban service area, the <br />sooner those services may come to them. He stated that he sympathized with <br />residents who purchased 10 acres assuming that it would remain that way, but <br />they needed to take into consideration that an adjoining neighbor may have an <br />entirely different opinion. Mr. Kreger stated that it is the Committee's responsibility <br />to collect the opinions and facts that relate to the area being discussed and then <br />to determine what is the general feeling of the public. He stated that the <br />committee will do their best to develop a compromise to satisfy both sides of the <br />issue. <br />