Laserfiche WebLink
Steering Committee Minutes <br />August 25, 1994 <br />4N...t i1 L pO�il tLli�� <br />Mike Fox stated that he felt the City Council and Planning Commission were the <br />only ones that wanted sewer and water extended to the north area. <br />Steve Ach stated that the question that needs to be addressed is whether or not <br />the City plans to extend sewer and water north of the current urban service area. <br />Mr. Fox stated that he was not in favor of it. <br />Steve Ach stated that development interest is coming to the area and the <br />community must choose how they wish to deal with it. He explained that there <br />can be problems with platting 2'/z acre lots in that the cost effectiveness of <br />providing services such as snow removal, emergency services, road maintenance <br />and repair is dramatically reduced. <br />Discussion followed regarding the present level of services. <br />Committee Member Dana Anderson stated that he felt the people of Elk River <br />should have a say in how they want their community to develop. He noted that if <br />they did not want a large number of people living north of County Road 33 on <br />10,000 square foot lots, that a 2% acre minimum would be a good alternative. <br />Mr. Anderson suggested that they could also consider "clustering" 1 acre home <br />sites in a 2'/2 acre minimum lot size area, leaving an open area. Mr. Anderson <br />encouraged citizens to continue to attend these meetings to provide input for <br />the development of the community. He stated that the purpose of this <br />committee is to steer that growth. <br />At this point, Steve Ach provided a map outlining the designated wetlands in Elk <br />River. <br />Committee Member Chris Kreger explained how services were more expensive <br />having a 2'/s lots versus smaller lots which are typically found in subdivisions with <br />water and sewer. <br />Discussion followed regarding park dedication fees when subdividing land. Julius <br />Nemeth expressed his concern that the fees are too high. <br />Debbie Turner, 206th Avenue N.W., owner of 3'/2 acres, stated that she is in favor <br />of maintaining the 10 acre minimum lot size and preserving some rural areas in <br />the City. <br />Paul Weymon, 19650 212th Avenue N.W., expressed his concern that the <br />Committee balance the concerns of the citizens regarding the use of their land. <br />He stated that he bought his property under the assumption that the rural <br />atmosphere would be maintained. He further stated that he finds the heavy <br />gravel and mining zone change contradictory to that goal. <br />Steve Ach stated that in planning for future development, the Steering <br />Committee must balance the need for future development and the services that <br />will be demanded while at the same time keeping taxes at a reasonable level. <br />Dick Hinkle explained his reasons for supporting a 2'/2 minimum lot size as <br />opposed to the 10 acre minimum. He stated that the change is not going to <br />