Laserfiche WebLink
Steering Committee Minutes <br />August 25, 1994 <br />------------------------ <br />r,i I u <br />Lr-Us L_LJi <br />age <br />extend sewer and water, it will be financially impossible for property owners to <br />pay the costs on even two and one-half acres and suggested a one -acre lot size <br />minimum. <br />Steve Ach reviewed the 1987 Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, which <br />included maintaining the semi -rural atmosphere. (See attached excerpt from <br />1987 Comprehensive Plan.) <br />Cecilia Scheel stated that she did not feel any of the goals and policies <br />mentioned by Mr. Ach applied to the northern area, and questioned if there was <br />any representation for the agricultural community when the 1987 plan was <br />discussed and adopted. <br />Committee Member Dick Hinkle explained that when he chaired the Steering <br />Committee in 1987, he contacted a significant number of people living north of <br />County Road 33 regarding the 10 acre minimum lot size. These property owners <br />did not object to the 10 acre minimum and stated that they liked the area as it <br />was and did not see any reason to develop it further. <br />Cecilia Scheel expressed her opposition to the extensive government controls <br />placed on farmers. <br />Dick Hinkle stated that he opposed the 10 acre minimum lot size, but did not <br />have the support of the people living in the northern area. <br />John Hansen, 22124 Monroe Street, questioned who determines wetlands. He <br />expressed his concern regarding the impact of wetlands when subdividing <br />property. <br />Chairman Minton stated that the DNR and Corps of Engineers determine a <br />majority of the wetlands. <br />Committee Member Marlon Glines questioned the group how many were <br />interested in keeping the 10 acre minimum and how many were in favor of <br />reducing the size to two and one-half acres. Chairman Minton noted that the <br />group was split 50-50. <br />Committee Member Mark Lucas questioned the impact of having 2'/z acre lots <br />next to 10 acre minimum parcels. <br />Chairman Minton explained that the advantage of 10 acre parcels is that if city <br />sewer and water were extended, it would be easier to subdivide 10 acre parcels <br />than 2'/2 acre parcels. He noted what typically happens is homes are placed on <br />2'/z lots in such a manner that they cannot be subdivided cost effectively. <br />Dick Gruys, 22347 Monroe Street, stated that he owns 232 acres in the northern <br />area. He expressed his opinion that the City should not be proud of the increase <br />in single family homes because it means more young families with children, <br />creating a need for more schools. He stated that single family home taxes do not <br />pay their share for schools. Mr. Gruys explained that he felt the City should be <br />promoting industrial development to help pay for schools and services. <br />